Court suspends prison term of mother

She was sentenced in cheque bounce case; court observes it would affect her kids

March 12, 2019 01:45 am | Updated 01:45 am IST - New Delhi

A Delhi court has cancelled six months’ imprisonment to a woman, a mother of six, in a cheque bounce case, observing that “any substantive sentence will definitely affect her children”.

Husband owed money

A Metropolitan Magistrate Court had sentenced the woman to six months in jail and fined her ₹1.85 lakh, holding her guilty of not making payment of ₹1.05 lakh, an amount which she owed to the complainant, despite being served a notice.

The complaint said that the woman’s husband, a caterer, had taken ₹1.05 lakh from him for making arrangements for his sister’s marriage.

However, due to some reasons, the ceremony was called off.

Issued a few cheques

The complainant said he intimated about it to the caterer 25 days prior to the scheduled date of the wedding, as per the agreement.

When the complainant demanded his money back from the caterer, he issued a few cheques signed by his wife.

However, when the cheques were presented before the bank concerned, it refused to make payment saying that the account had insufficient fund.

The complainant then sent a notice to the woman. When she failed to respond to the notice within the mandatory 15 days period, the complainant filed a complaint at a Metropolitan Magistrate Court, which held the woman guilty and awarded the sentence.

Lenient punishment

The woman had moved an appeal against the order in the court of Additional Sessions Judge Suresh Kumar Gupta.

Though Mr. Gupta upheld the conviction, he allowed her plea for a lenient punishment and modified her sentence to only ₹1.85 lakh fine.

“The appellant has not made the payment of the cheques in question to the respondent. The appellant has a large family to take care of. The appellant has five daughters and one son. Any substantive sentence will definitely affect her children. Keeping in view this fact, the sentence imposed by the trial court is modified. The appellant is sentenced to pay a fine of ₹1.85 lakh,” Mr. Gupta said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.