‘BSF officers cannot leave and come back as per wish’

HC dismisses plea of ex-Deputy Commandant of BSF to rejoin work in same capacity

December 30, 2020 01:07 am | Updated 01:07 am IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI, 24/01/2018: A view of Delhi High Court, in New Delhi on January 24, 2018.  
Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

NEW DELHI, 24/01/2018: A view of Delhi High Court, in New Delhi on January 24, 2018. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

The Delhi High Court has ruled that employment at the Border Security Force (BSF) is not a “hop-on and hop-off service” from which its members can leave and come back whenever they wish.

A Bench of Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Justice Asha Menon made the remarks while dismissing the plea of an Ex-Deputy Commandant of BSF — who took voluntary retirement but later wanted to rejoin the service in the same capacity as prior to the resignation.

Ex-Deputy Commandant Mandeep Singh had opted for voluntary retirement as his mother was suffering from Parkinson disease since 2008 and was undergoing treatment. While seeking permission for the voluntary retirement, he had also cited that his wife was posted at Amritsar as Judicial Magistrate staying along with her 2-year-old child. At that period, Mr. Singh was posted in Delhi.

Withdrawing resignation

BSF’s counsel argued that no personnel has a right to withdraw the resignation and it is the decision of the Indian Government whether to allow any personnel to withdraw his resignation or not.

The BSF’s counsel said Mr. Singh, in his August 17, 2018, application to the President, did not withdraw his resignation but made a request for being permitted to join after voluntary retirement. The said request of Mr. Singh has already been rejected, the counsel said.

“In our view, tendering and acceptance of resignation from secure employment has an element of finality and irrevocability thereto,” the court said. It added that “the reigns of the country cannot be entrusted to a personnel, who in the past has chosen his own interest over that of the public or the country”.

It said conduct of Ms. Singh, though still having substantial period of deputation with National Security Guard (NSG) left, paid scant regard to the same in the face of difficulties of his wife and small child and his mother “do not indeed show the petitioner [Mr. Singh] to have put the service before self”.

The court further observed that “the personnel tendering resignation also tend to forget that we are a country of scarcities including scarcities of employment opportunities”.

“Here, advertisements inviting application for a few hundred posts elicit applications from lakhs. Though, we are a country of scarcities, we are rich in human resource...Tendering of resignation from employment with the government by one, creates vacancy, for which hundreds if not lakhs await an opportunity,” it said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.