BJP files defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal and Atishi Marlena over poaching allegation

Matter listed by court for hearing on May 4

Updated - April 30, 2024 09:09 am IST

Published - April 30, 2024 08:30 am IST - New Delhi

AAP Leader Atishi Singh Marlena and Delhi Minister Atishi Marlena

AAP Leader Atishi Singh Marlena and Delhi Minister Atishi Marlena | Photo Credit: The Hindu

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Praveen Shankar Kapoor on Monday filed a defamation case against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Cabinet Minister Atishi Marlena over poaching allegations made by the two who had said that Aam Aadmi Party leaders were approached by the BJP to join them in return for cash.

The matter is listed for hearing on May 4 in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Tanya Bamniyal of the Rouse Avenue Court.

Alleging that the claims made by AAP’s senior leaders against the BJP are false, Mr. Kapoor said that AAP leaders had not furnished any material to substantiate their claims.

In his application in the court, Mr. Kapoor cited a social media post of Mr. Kejriwal (dated Jan. 27) in which he had alleged that the BJP had contacted seven AAP MLAs and was offering ₹25 crore to poach them.

He also cited similar claims and a press briefing by Ms. Marlena on April 2 in which she had said that she had received an offer to join the BJP to “save” her “political career”, failing which she would be arrested by the Enforcement Directorate.

“By such kind of malicious scandalous statements, you and your colleagues defame the BJP and its members and try to gain political mileage by use of the platform of press conferences to make such false statements knowing fully well that all social media platforms would carry such news as you are not only an MLA but a Minister in the government of NCT of Delhi,” the complaint alleged.

In his plea, Mr. Kapoor had sought the withdrawal of the remarks made during the press conference and an apology on TV and social media. He also stated that if the same was not done, he would be constrained to initiate both civil and criminal proceedings against Ms. Marlena.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.