Haryana’s plan to examine status of forestland irks green brigade

January 28, 2017 12:44 am | Updated 12:44 am IST - GURUGRAM:

The Haryana government has decided to constitute committees in different districts of the State to examine the status of lands notified under Section 4 and 5 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), 1900, as “forests” with reference to a Supreme Court case decided two years ago.

Environmentalists, however, have accused the government of showing unwarranted hurry to examine the forest areas to help builders and bureaucrats holding land in the Aravallis.

Report in 2 months

Reacting to the government order to form committees, environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal said: “Haryana’s forest cover is less than 4% and even the dense forest of Mangar Bani sacred grove is not officially identified by Haryana as a forest. A State government policy directed by public interest should focus on completing the exercise of identifying forests as per dictionary meaning, and increase officially identified forests, rather than trying to reduce the little PLPA areas currently identified as forest, as seems to be the case.”

As per the orders dated January 16, the committees comprising Deputy Commissioner and District Revenue Officer among others need to complete the exercise in two months and submit their report to the government.

According to activists, the Haryana government is required to complete the exercise of identifying forests as per the dictionary meaning as directed by the Supreme Court in Godavarman (1996) and Lafarge (2011) judgments.

Even the National Green Tribunal has reiterated this, as has the Ministry of Environment and Forests and the National Capital Region Planning Board, but Haryana has not taken any steps to identify forests as per the dictionary meaning. Instead, for those parts of the Aravalli hills which are treated as forests, it is taking active steps to exclude them from being treated as forests, by its own interpretation of the B.S Sandhu versus Government of India (2014) judgment thereby denying them the protection of forest laws, claim the activists.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.