Buildings in Pragati Maidan not heritage, panel tells HC

February 16, 2017 12:23 am | Updated 12:23 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Hall of Nations, the country’s first pillar-less building, was inaugurated in 1972. — File Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

Hall of Nations, the country’s first pillar-less building, was inaugurated in 1972. — File Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

The Heritage Conservation Committee on Wednesday told the Delhi High Court that it had on February 2 rejected the recommendation against demolition of buildings in Pragati Maidan, including Hall of Nations and Nehru Pavilion.

“Modern heritage”

The Heritage Conservation Committee informed Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva that the recommendation in favour of the structures was made by a sub-committee, formed to consider whether these structures should be preserved under the category of “modern heritage”.

Advocate Saket Sikri, appearing for the India Trade Promotion Organisation (ITPO), said the sub-committee had gone beyond the criterion for any structure to be called heritage. He added that a “heritage” building should be at least two generations or 60 years old.

Hall of Nations, India’s first pillar-less building, was inaugurated in 1972. The ITPO had proposed the demolition of these structures for redevelopment of Pragati Maidan as a world-class exhibition centre.

The court was hearing a plea by Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH) seeking protection of 62 buildings, including Hall of Nations and Nehru Pavilion in Pragati Maidan, which it has identified as “modern heritage”.

“They [the Heritage Conservation Committee] are the decision-making authority. They have rejected the recommendation. What is left?” Justice Sachdeva said to the INTACH counsel.

On a request that the counsel be given some time to study the Heritage Conservation Committee’s decision, the court kept the matter pending.

Stating that the Pragati Maidan redevelopment project will bring in foreign investment, the ITPO said such petitions will affect foreign investment and thus should be disposed of.

A Division Bench had recently rejected a plea against the in-principal approval granted by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to foreign architects for redevelopment of Pragati Maidan.

“Complete abdication”

In its plea, INTACH has alleged “complete abdication” of responsibility by the Heritage Conservation Committee and the Delhi Urban Art Commission to protect the city’s “contemporary architectural heritage”.

The ITPO had urged the court not to interfere with the proposed demolition, saying that the ₹2,500-crore project would be a good development for the city.

Batting for demolition of the buildings in Pragati Maidan, it had submitted that the project had been approved at the highest levels, including the Prime Minister’s Office.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.