2017 records highest graft cases against Delhi Ministers in decade

Lokayukta got 24 complaints against Cabinet in 3-and-a-half-years of AAP govt: RTI reply

September 29, 2018 01:45 am | Updated 07:51 am IST - New Delhi

File photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

File photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

The year 2017 witnessed the office of the Delhi Lokayukta receive the highest number of complaints against the Council of Ministers, including the Chief Minister, in a decade, a Right to Information (RTI) reply has revealed.

Since the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government came to power in 2015 till July 31 this year, the Lokayukta received 24 complaints, 11 of them being in 2017, against the Council of Ministers, the August 30 reply to a query by The Hindu showed.

From January 1, 2008, till the end of 2013, which was the last term of the Sheila Dikshit government, 34 complaints against Ministers were received, with 2012 seeing the most of the five years — nine.

Of all the 56 complaints against Ministers from 2008 till July 31, 2018, the Lokayukta had disposed of 47, while nine were still under investigation or pending.

Among the complaints in 2017, one was based on an allegation by former Minister and suspended AAP MLA, Kapil Mishra.

After being removed from the Cabinet in May 2017, Mr. Mishra alleged that he saw Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal take money from Public Works Department, Health and Power Minister Satyendar Jain.

The Chief Minister’s name was dropped from the case earlier this year.

A total of 156 complaints against members of the Delhi Legislative Assembly were received from 2008 till July 31, 2018, the RTI reply stated.

The year 2013 had seen the most such complaints, with 30.

Of the 156 complaints against MLAs, 125 had been disposed of and 31 were being investigated or were pending, the reply read. The Lokayukta also received a total of 311 complaints against officials of the Delhi government from 2008 till July 31 this year, with 2011 seeing the highest number — 66.

Since officials are not covered under the definition of “public functionary” in the Delhi Lokayukta and Uplokayukta Act, 1995, these complaints are usually disposed of when received or sent to the appropriate authority, officials said.

As on July 31, only one complaint out of the 311 was pending, the RTI reply said.

‘Stronger watchdog’

Though the office of the Lokayukta has been in operation since 1997 in Delhi, political parties have raised concerns over its effectiveness. For the AAP, which arose out of the anti-corruption movement and promise of a stronger watchdog in the form of a Jan Lokpal, the Lokayukta has become a “toothless institution”, said spokesperson Saurabh Bharadwaj.

“The Lokayukta is basically toothless. The Jan Lokpal Bill that we had passed and which would have given the Lokpal independent prosecution and investigation powers has been sent back by the Centre. We are waiting for the Supreme Court to give clarity on who has the power over prosecution,” said Mr. Bharadwaj. BJP leader and Delhi Assembly Leader of Opposition Vijender Gupta, too, questioned the effectiveness of the Lokayukta.

“My complaint against Sheila Dikshit for misusing funds for advertisements had led to a strong recommendation by the Lokayukta, but the action was rejected by the President in 2013. The Lokayukta has not been able to set an example,” he said. He added that the Congress and then the AAP governments did not have the “political will” to amend the Act to strengthen the Lokayukta.

YearComplaints against  Delhi Government officials   Complaints against MLAs Complaints against Council of Ministers
2008163Nil
20091696
201030163
201166216
201257229
201347307
201426151
20151384
201627207
201761111
2018 (till July 31)712
Total31115656
Cases disposed of31012447
Cases under investigation/pending1319

 

Allegations covered 

- Failure to act in accordance with norms of integrity and conduct of public functionaries 

- Abuse or misuse of position to obtain any gain or favour or to cause loss or hardship

- Improper or corrupt motives or personal interest in discharge of functions

- Possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to known resources of income

Source: RTI reply from Office of Lokayukta dated August 30, 2018

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.