Answering your vehicle-related queries

January 13, 2021 10:13 am | Updated 01:58 pm IST

Moving on from the Innova Crysta

Rahul Vikas, Bengaluru: I am looking to upgrade from my 2017 Toyota Innova Crysta and have shortlisted the BMW X5 and the Mercedes-Benz GLE 400d. My usage is on broken roads and long-distance journeys, so a soft suspension and comfortable seats are a priority. Which of these best fit my bill?

The X5 is a nicer car to drive. However, on bad roads, the GLE has a better ride and absorbs broken roads better. The 400d engine is also smooth and has sufficient punch to make driving a pleasure.

A question of engines

Eswar, Hyderabad: If a 1.0-litre turbo engine provides more mileage and performance, then why use a 1.2-litre petrol engine? What are the pros and cons of both?

The difference between a 1.0-litre turbo-petrol and 1.2-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine is the former tends to be a three-cylinder unit, while the latter usually comprises four cylinders. A three-cylinder engine produces unbalanced vibrations due to the reciprocatory action of two pistons in the same direction, while that gets balanced out in a four-cylinder engine.

So, in real-world conditions, a 1.0-litre engine would feel more noisy, jerky and sluggish in its power delivery at lower RPMs, and also filter some vibrations into the cabin or clutch pedal. To counter the vibrations, carmakers generally use a balancer shaft and also equip the engine with a turbocharger to improve low-end torque and throttle response, which is further improved by an automatic transmission. On the other hand, a 1.2-litre engine would feel significantly smoother at idle and off the line, thus allowing for better in-city driveability and gradually building pace thereafter.

Now coming to the fuel efficiency, even though three-cylinder engines are lighter, and a turbocharger minimises the airpumping losses inside the engine, the real-world figures depend a lot on the driving style. Since the meat of the powerband in turbocharged engines lies at higher RPMs, it is tough to obtain consistently high economy figures if one wants to extract the maximum performance. In comparison, a 1.2-litre naturally-aspirated engine would end up consuming less fuel for a similar drive experience.

In a nutshell, A 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine will be suitable for a driving style aimed at extracting maximum performance from the vehicle, while a 1.2-litre is for a relaxed and comfortable daily commute, with occasional fun at high revs.

Hormazd Sorabjee is the editor of Autocar India. Mail your feedback and queries to roadshow@thehindu.co.in

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.