Building it right

BBMP bye-laws should focus on safety of smaller buildings too. By Ranjani Govind

July 15, 2022 04:37 pm | Updated July 16, 2022 05:04 pm IST

Here are some of the suggestions and amendments for BBMP bye-law 2020 made by experts of ACCE(I).

* In view of the building collapses in recent times and keeping safety issues in mind, NBC-2016 has made it mandatory to include set of drawings of plans, foundation and super structure drawings, service drawings including soil investigation reports for all types of buildings.

* Involvement of appropriate professionals is not being implemented currently and hence the bye-laws should be specific while assigning technical responsibilities. E.g: Banning non-civil engineers from issuing stability certificates, banning non-technical personnel from building construction activities.

* NBC-2016 has moved forward in specifying engagement of appropriate professionals during the process of obtaining building permit itself by insisting on obtaining engagement certificates from the professionals. BBMP bye-laws are yet to recognise this important fact.

* BBMP bye-laws have failed to recognise the profession of Civil Engineer/ Structural Engineer/ Geotechnical Engineer/ PHE/ Service Engineer. These professions have to be accepted to be part of the building permit process.

* The bye-laws have focused mainly on high-rise buildings. These types of buildings account for only 1.6% of the total buildings in the country. The bye-laws are silent on safety specifications when it comes to smaller buildings like G+4 and below, which form 98.4% of the total buildings. Eg: Bye-laws insist on earthquake-resistant designs for high-rise buildings, while no such mandatory provisions are made for smaller buildings – as though the smaller buildings will not get affected by earthquakes.

* The height of basement/ parking floor is ambiguously presented as 2.4m in some places and 2.75m in some other places of the draft bye-laws. 2.4m is impractical. Hence 2.75m should be adopted.

* Safety auditing (Structural/ Electrical/ Fire etc.,) of buildings shall be made mandatory every 5 years after 20 years’ life of the building.

* There are sanction process issues that are creating hurdles for consultants. The same have to be ironed out. E.g: Monopoly of the software used. The bye-laws insist on using expensive CAD software even though lesser expensive softwares are also available. Hence the sanction process should not insist on use of monopoly software.

* Tolerance limits for plot/ building measurements shall be specified in the bye-laws, so as to avoid harassment to the citizens.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.