Bridge of Spies: A tour de force

October 17, 2015 04:15 pm | Updated 06:38 pm IST

The most important question regarding the new Steven Spielberg film in town, Bridge of Spies, was always this: will it be as good as we want it to be? Because there was no way in this world that a script, polished by Coen Brothers, directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Hanks as a New York-based lawyer, who finds himself negotiating on behalf of the U.S. government with the Soviet Union in the middle of the Cold War, was ever going to disappoint. So, is it as good as we wanted it to be? The answer is yes.

This film hits all the right notes; in the last 20 minutes, I was already thinking about how many Oscars it would win. Bridge of Spies showcases, I dare say, an America that stood for superior moral values as opposed to the Iron Curtain that clothed much of Eastern Europe and Asia. It is set during the Cold War when a nuclear apocalypse was an impending threat and one mistake — political, diplomatic or even a technical snag in a submarine — could potentially trigger it.

Genre: Historical drama Director: Steven Spielberg Cast: Tom Hanks, Mark Rylance Bottomline: An insurance lawyer finds himself in the thick of the Cold War

By doing this, the film does what it set out to do: illuminate the idea of honour and patriotism, ask if human companionships are beyond and above the ideologies we believe in, underline the fear psychosis experienced by the people of both these super powers, and remind us of historical events, such as the building of the Berlin Wall, that left a deep scar on the human psyche.

We have all heard of how ordinary citizens were discredited and pummelled into surrender in the U.S. after being called communists during the height of the Cold War. Bridge of Spies shows what it means for a middle-class father and husband to face the wrath of the public and be called a traitor for merely doing his constitutional duty — every person has the right to defend oneself before the law. How should Rudolf, who stands by the Soviet Union despite being promised money and freedom for co-operation, be seen by the American public? Is his act not honourable? What about Powers, who appears to have given enough to the opposite camp? Should he be called a traitor even though he volunteered to stake his life for his country? It opens up plenty of discussions about what it means to commit treason and be a traitor.

The film, at its core, is held together by Tom Hanks and Mark Rylance (who, no doubt, will be a strong contender for the Best Supporting Actor Oscar). Bridge of Spies, with its purposeful, witty writing, and great performances, juxtaposes two competing world views. This is a fine film from Steven Spielberg after a long time.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.