Still a work in progress

There were moments in Gopukiran and Ashin’s performance when the rapport was missing

January 16, 2020 04:22 pm | Updated 04:22 pm IST

Gopukiran Sadasivan and Ashin Gopukiran performing at Brahma Gana Sabha in Chennai

Gopukiran Sadasivan and Ashin Gopukiran performing at Brahma Gana Sabha in Chennai

The dancing couple Gopukiran Sadasivan, disciple of Mythili and Girija Chandran and Shantha and Dhananjayan, and Ashin Kiran, a Kalakshetra alumnus and a disciple of the Dhananjayans, are striving to establish their identity; they also run a Bharatanatyam school ‘Kiran’s Academy of Natya.’ Their concise Margam contained a sloka on Rama (‘Surya vamsha tilaka’ written by Gopukiran, Kharaharapriya), padavarnam (‘Rama neeve na rakshaku’, Kharaharapriya, Thenmadam Narasimhachari, visualised by Shantha and Dhananjayan), Rama-Sita samvadam (Sita part written by Sudarsan Srinivasan, Rama’s rejoinder by Dr. S. Raguraman, tuned by Udupi Srinath in Ahir Bhairav and Madhuvanthi respectively) and a thillana (Ritigowla, Adi, Rijesh Gopalakrishnan, sahitya by Gopukiran).

It was a well-rehearsed show, marked by a high level of coordination. The duo’s talent and sound training showed in their well-timed nritta and easy mime. However, they look like they are yet to mature as a performing pair. Bharatanatyam is essentially a solo art form and needs sensitive adaptation for a duo. For example, during the varnam pallavi, ‘Kamakoti sundaraakaara’ when the dancers take turns at describing Rama’s beauty, one felt the involvement came down when Ashin looked at Gopukiran during his turn, without mirroring his sentiments, here, admiration of Rama, or looking at the deity in question.

The varnam on the whole was a riot of rhythm and melody, each jostling for attention. The jathis were beautiful but the dancers need to be more agile and work more on araimandi.

The pair performed a contemporary take on the Ramayana, a conversation between Rama and Sita in Ayodhya, a sort of ‘tu-tu-main-main’ blame game. Sita is the aggrieved party and blames Rama for not looking after her properly in the forest, enabling Ravana’s abduction, and for allowing others to doubt her chastity and allowing the ‘agni pariksha’ when they subsequently re-unite. Rama refuses to accept the blame and accuses Seetha of accompanying him to the forest despite his wishes and asking him to capture the golden deer when Lakshmana offered to. Both dancers were expressive and involved, especially Ashin’s breakdown when Rama counters her accusations was sensitive. Yet one felt that this two-way conversation removed artistic suggestion, the bedrock of Bharatanatyam. That’s a point to mull over.

The performance was buoyed by the individual contribution of supporting artistes — calm guide Balakrishnan (nattuvangam), Udupi Srinath (vocal) who was most inspiring, the committed Keshavan (mridangam), the melodious Sujith Naik (flute) and the tuneful Sikhamani (violin).

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.