‘Half-baked decision’

How effective is the Distance Education Bureau’s move of de-recognising many courses, including several at IGNOU?

September 22, 2018 02:56 pm | Updated 02:56 pm IST

 CB Sharma, current Chairman of the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS)

CB Sharma, current Chairman of the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS)

On deputation from the School of Education, Indira Gandhi National Open University, CB Sharma, current Chairman of the National Institute of Open Schooling gets candid about distance education in India.

Recently, the Distance Education Bureau (DEB) of the University Grants Commission (UGC) de-recognised many distance-learning courses, including several at IGNOU. Your view?

The UGC acts like big brother without the requisite expertise and is damaging the system and the interest of the learners who otherwise cannot attend regular education. Till 2013, the Distance Education Council constituted under the IGNOU Act was looking after the promotion and coordination of the open university and distance education system. It was a full-fledged body with more than 50 people. When it was merged with the UGC, it became the DEB, comprising less than half-a dozen-people. Given that distance education handles about 30% of the learners of higher education in India, it needs an independent, expert agency.

So you are not in favour of the decision?

I agree that distance education in India needs an overhaul, and some courses and open universities de-recognised by the UCG deserved. India has around 15 open universities and hundreds of traditional universities that have a distance education wing. Many of these function simply as certifying agencies. So, such an exercise is important. However, the UGC’s decision is half baked and taken in a huff. There should be an expert body parallel to the UGC, with experts from distance education, who should take researched and considered decisions.

What ails distance education in India?

Ideally, it is an amalgamation of well thought-out and structured study material developed in different media, such as text and audio-visual that will help students understand a subject without regular access to a teacher, and personal contact hours for resolving doubts and evaluating assignments. All of this needs funding, and it is a misconception that distance learning is cheap. It is in fact, quite expensive and we are only able to subsidise because of economies of scale. However, this is often not sufficient and in the absence of funding, most places cut corners, reducing distance learning to correspondence courses where students rote-learn study material and give exams to secure certification. As such, there is little respect for it. Also, profit-making institutions often do not spend money on development of material and save major portion of the fees collected. This has damaged the reputation of distance learning. There is also some pressure to privatise distance education, with a large number of private players who have entered this domain.

How does one overcome the challenges?

There should be an independent, expert agency to give a direction to distance education in the country, and it should become the custodian of all self-learning-material developed by different Open and Distance Learning (ODL) institutions. Gradually, private institutions should be allowed to enter the sector and also use the material. Use of multiple media should be a pre-condition for offering courses through ODL. The agency should be allowed to decide on what courses institutions can offer and should be the monitoring agency for ODL. As universities, they must also get the same type of autonomy that other universities have.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.