TDSAT gives split verdict on 3G roaming

July 03, 2012 12:19 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:59 am IST - New Delhi

HYDERABAD (AP) -03-07-2012 - BL/ VERDICT ON 3G :- The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal has given a split verdict in the third generation (3G) as mobile operators will continue to offer roaming services .  A telecom operator offers unlimited  service as a hoarding goes out in Hyderabad .- PHOTO: P_V_SIVAKUMAR

HYDERABAD (AP) -03-07-2012 - BL/ VERDICT ON 3G :- The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal has given a split verdict in the third generation (3G) as mobile operators will continue to offer roaming services . A telecom operator offers unlimited service as a hoarding goes out in Hyderabad .- PHOTO: P_V_SIVAKUMAR

TheTelecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) on Tuesday gave a split verdict in the 3G intra-circle roaming case with its chairman allowing operators’ plea against the government order to stop the service, while its member dismissed it.

The two member bench comprising TDSAT chairman Justice S.B. Sinha and member P.K. Rastogi differed in theirs findings.

Justice Sinha allowed the telecom operators’ plea against the government’s directive to stop intra-circle 3G roaming saying that it was violative of natural justice. Mr. Rastogi, however, dismissed telecom operators plea saying they cannot provide roaming.

The chairman was of view that the DoT had not followed the proper procedure and the operators were not given proper time to put their views.

According to Justice Sinha it was a violation of natural justice. Setting aside the DoT’s order to operators to stop ICR roaming, he asked DoT to start the procedure afresh by giving proper time to operators to respond.

Meanwhile, Mr. Rastogi dismissed the appeal of telecom operators saying that they can’t provide 3G services by having mere 2G licence.

TDSAT has a sanctioned strength of three people including the chairman. However, due to retirement of its technical member the tribunal now has two people, which led to the split verdict.

TDSAT had concluded its marathon hearing on the plea in April.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.