MCX-SX is well ring-fenced from NSEL crisis: U. K. Sinha

Recovery orders for over Rs.500 cr issued in two months

November 24, 2013 12:29 am | Updated June 02, 2016 04:39 am IST - MUMBAI:

U. K. Sinha

U. K. Sinha

Securities and Exchange Board of India Chairman U. K. Sinha on Saturday allayed fears of crisis at the parent group of MCX-SX spilling over to the bourse, saying that the troubled Financial Technologies-promoted stock exchange is ring-fenced from other group firms.

“I would like to clarify that the promoters of these companies (MCX and the crisis-hit spot exchange NSEL) are also promoters of a stock exchange (MCX-SX) that we regulate. But, I would like to assure you that we are conscious that the entity we regulate is thoroughly ring-fenced,” Mr. Sinha told reporters when asked whether he fears the trouble at the promoter company would engulf MCX-SX.

Mr. Sinha was speaking on the sidelines of a capital markets summit here, organised by the Indian School of Business.

He also pointed out the change of management at the bourse saying: “I would like to point out that there was a complete change of management at MCX-SX with two public interest directors being nominated by SEBI.

“Since we are worried about risk management, we have also verified the collaterals and other securities required for this settlement. For the point of view of settlement, good governance and for insuring the market that things are alright we have taken many steps.”

Jignesh Shah-promoted Financial Technologies runs a clutch of market institutions — the stock exchange MCX-SX, commodities bourse MCX and the commodities spot exchange NSEL.

On the new disclosure norms for listed companies, Mr. Sinha said the regulator was not asking for extra disclosures, but only trying to plug the loopholes, which were rampant.

Disclosure norms

“We have decided to now look at adequacy of disclosures and not extra disclosures. Accordingly, promoter shareholding which is pledged should be disclosed, this is a requirement under SAST regulations,” he said.

“We have found that using very innovative methods, advised by powerful legal firms, companies came out with a method called NDU (non-disposal undertaking) and various other methods of creating encumbrance. We have not created a guideline that any sort of encumbrance has to be reported,” Mr. Sinha added.

On the progress made on the setting up of self-regulatory organisations (SROs) for the mutual fund industry, Mr. Sinha said SEBI had so far received three applications from the AMCs’ distribution side. It should be the job of an SRO to regulate distributors and “we hope to make progress on it soon’’, he added.

On recovery from defaulting/erring companies, Mr. Sinha said, “in the past two months that the search and seizure order has been in place, we have passed orders to recover more than Rs.500 crore. We have frozen a whole number of bank accounts. Though I don’t have the exact number of bank accounts frozen, a number of accounts and assets have been frozen worth over Rs.500 crore.”

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.