RBI scrutinising 200 stressed accounts

Exercise part of regular annual inspection, says official; Videocon, Jindal Steel among those under lens

August 15, 2018 08:22 pm | Updated 08:22 pm IST - New Delhi

An Indian man walks past the entrance of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) head office in Mumbai on August 1, 2018. 
India's central bank raised on August 1 borrowing rates for the second time in as many months as it seeks to tame inflation in Asia's third-largest economy. / AFP PHOTO / Punit PARANJPE

An Indian man walks past the entrance of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) head office in Mumbai on August 1, 2018. India's central bank raised on August 1 borrowing rates for the second time in as many months as it seeks to tame inflation in Asia's third-largest economy. / AFP PHOTO / Punit PARANJPE

As part of its efforts to contain rising non-performing assets (NPAs), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has started scrutiny of 200 large accounts to assess the level of stress and provisioning done against them by respective banks.

The RBI is examining whether banks have followed prudential norms in respect of these stressed assets, a senior public sector bank official said.

The central bank is also assessing classification, provisioning and debt recast in respect of those loans, the official added.

This is a part of regular annual inspection of book of the banks that the central bank undertakes each year after the closure of the financial year, another official said.

Some of the accounts include those of Videocon, Jindal Steel and Power, the official added.

This exercise comes at a time when gross NPAs in the banking system have risen to about ₹10.3 lakh crore, or 11.2 % of advances, compared with ₹8 lakh crore, or 9.5 % of total loans, as on March 31, 2017.

Following the annual inspection of the last year, many lenders, including Axis Bank, Bank of India and Yes Bank, were caught for under-reporting of NPAs.

Under-reported NPAs

The lenders started reporting divergences since June last year for having under-reported NPAs in FY16. This was followed by a second round of disclosures, starting October, of under-reporting in FY17 by a few lenders.

In most cases, this led to shooting up of NPAs and an ensuing jump in provisions against dud assets. This eroded their bottomlines, and led to a sell-off in the stock causing erosion of wealth for investors.

Private sector lenders, which were reputed for their caution on the asset quality front vis-a-vis the poorly governed state-owned peers, were the worst hit in this exercise.

Among others, mid-sized private sector lender Yes Bank was found to have under-reported gross NPAs by a whopping ₹11,000 crore in the two fiscals, while the third largest lender, Axis Bank, was found to have a divergence of more than ₹14,000 crore and ICICI Bank had over ₹5,000 crore on these accounts for FY16 alone.

Last year, RBI had tweaked the rules to make it compulsory for lenders to disclose under-reporting of bad assets. Before this there was a massive book clean-up through the asset quality review (AQR) in the previous year.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.