Fed’s rosy scenario leaves inflation puzzle for Powell

Policymakers mystified about why prices aren’t rising given the economic growth

As incoming Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell works through his holiday shopping list, he might consider the nearly 50% discount he could get buying Calvin Klein underwear online instead of at the local mall.

In the litany of reasons that explains why U.S. consumer price inflation has stalled, the drop in clothing prices last month, which was the largest in 20 years, takes its place alongside cheap cellphone contracts, one-off declines in drug prices and cheap gasoline, among others. The Fed considers all of these price drops “transitory,” but there have been enough in a row for the central bank to miss its inflation target five years running, and fresh economic projections this week indicate policymakers remain mystified about why prices are not rising, given unemployment is at a 17-year low and the economy is growing steadily.

When the Fed met and raised short-term interest rates for the fifth time since late 2015, the inflation issue triggered two dissents among the nine voters on the Federal Open Market Committee, and that division could widen.

Long-term problem

“Inflation ... is too low and has been for some time,” Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said in dissenting.

Mr. Evans framed low inflation as a long-term problem if businesses and households stop believing the Fed is committed to its 2% inflation target.

A low but steady level of inflation is considered healthy in developed economies, but it depends importantly on public psychology and expectations that Mr. Evans said “appear to me to have drifted down.”

The debate will likely dog Mr. Powell during his early months as Fed chief. It will be hard for the Fed to justify further rate increases unless inflation moves towards the central bank’s target.

That, in turn, would saddle Mr. Powell with exceptionally low interest rates, and little room to respond with rate reductions in the event of a recession.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen had little advice other than to acknowledge that something may be fundamentally wrong about how the Fed looks at inflation, unemployment and the important relationship between them.

“I have tried to be straightforward in saying that this could end up being something that is more ingrained and turns out to be permanent. It’s very important to watch it and, if necessary, rethink,” Ms. Yellen told reporters, referring to the Fed’s inflation miss.

Economic projections issued after the Fed’s policy meeting contained what seems to be an internal tension. Economic growth is forecast to accelerate next year, and unemployment to drop to 3.9% from the current 4.1%. That should put it at a level low enough to mean workers have leverage to demand wage increases and businesses feel emboldened to raise prices.

Yet inflation is not seen rising and the Fed did not say it expects to raise rates any faster then already planned. Fed officials say their preferred forecast for inflation is about 1.7% for this year, rising to 1.9% in 2018, then reaching 2% in 2019 and staying there.

They have made similar projections in the past, and been wrong.

On the list of possible reasons, Ms. Yellen, like Mr. Evans, cited a possible slip in public expectations. She said the Fed may also simply misunderstand how inflation and unemployment relate in the current economy, with millions of working-age adults still on the sidelines of the job market, more choosing part-time work, and an expanding “gig economy.”

Retail experts and analysts who follow inflation say the Fed’s inflation outlook is not likely to get any help soon from the prices of clothes, home appliances, electronics, cars or other goods.

The 1.3% drop in apparel prices recorded in November was the largest since 1998, when the move to globalised supply chains and the integration of China into the world economy were still gaining momentum.

Retail transformation

Now, it is the transformation of how things are sold and how consumers shop that is holding down prices, said Blerina Uruci, vice president of economic research at Barclays. The use of e-commerce sites like Amazon still only accounts for about 10% of retail sales, Ms. Uruci noted, and the impact of technological innovation on sales and distribution will likely take years to run its course.

Meanwhile, consumers are becoming more adept with the tools at hand. Anyone looking for underwear in a brick-and-mortar store can quickly compare prices on a phone.

Technology is “allowing shoppers to push retailers towards a very competitive environment,” said Rick Helfenbein, president and CEO of the American Apparel and Footwear Association.

“Retailers have reacted.”

A letter from the Editor

Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Support Quality Journalism
Recommended for you
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | May 25, 2020 9:20:59 PM |

Next Story