EU lifts ban on Sri Lanka’s fisheries exports

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:36 pm IST

Published - April 22, 2016 11:24 pm IST - COLOMBO:

The European Union (EU) has lifted its 15-month-long ban on Sri Lanka’s fisheries exports.

Prior to the ban imposed in January 2015, the EU accounted for nearly one-third of Sri Lanka’s fish exports in terms of volume and about 40 per cent of the exports in terms of revenue Against the total fish export earnings of $ 267 million that year, Sri Lanka got $ 108 million from the Europe.

The ban was imposed on the ground that Sri Lanka indulged in “illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.” The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government blamed the previous government for failing “to comply with international regulations despite repeated warnings [from the EU].”

Mangala Samaraweera, Foreign Minister, said the EU Commission’s recommendation to revoke the ban had been forwarded to the EU Council. This was expected to come into legal effect by July.

Mahinda Amaraweera, Fisheries Minister, told The Hindu that the withdrawal of the ban had been done with “no conditions” imposed on Sri Lanka.

However, in the run-up to the EU’s decision, the Sri Lanka government took a number of steps to have the ban lifted. Rules and regulations were introduced in tune with international norms and new regulations framed for high seas fishing. A national plan was prepared to counter illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.

Karumenu Vella, EU Commissioner for Environment, Maritimes Affairs and Fisheries, stated that “after a lengthy dialogue process, Sri Lanka has now successfully reformed its fisheries governance system.”

In January 2015, exactly a week after President Maithripala Sirisena took office, the EU’s ban took effect on the ground that Sri Lanka indulged in “illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.” Though the EU had decided to impose ban in October 2014, it implemented the decision three months later. The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government had blamed the previous Rajapaksa government for the latter's “failure to comply with international regulations despite repeated warnings [from the EU].”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.