From the Archives (May 21, 1919): Tampering with the Evidence.

May 21, 2019 12:15 am | Updated 12:15 am IST

Their lordships Mr. Justice Walsh and Mr. Justice Stuart disposed of the appeal of Asghar against the sentence of death passed on him by the Sessions Judge of Budaun on a charge of having murdered an old man named Chiddo. It was alleged that the accused decoyed the deceased into the house of Amirulla under the pretext of getting him a goat for sale, and throttled him to death. Amirulla was alleged to have abetted the crime by holding the deceased’s legs. The motive of the murder was suggested to have been the greed of taking possession of Rs. 75 which the deceased had with him on selling his house. Their Lordships said it was quite clear that the evidence of the daughter of Amirulla, as the Sessions Judge had found, was tampered with by the Sub-Inspector himself or through his instrumentality apparently with the insidious and thoroughly unjust motive of persuading her to give the best evidence against Asghar and to say as little as she could against her father who was tried with him.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.