‘Had there been security for common man, a five-year-old girl would nothave been raped in the capital’

The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned ‘Z’ security to industrialist Mukesh Ambani when the government was unable to provide security to the common man.

A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Kurian Joseph, hearing a petition on VIP security, said had there been security for the common man, a five-year-old girl would not have been raped in the capital.

“We read in newspapers that Ministry of Home has directed providing CISF security to an individual,” said Justice Singhvi, without naming Mr. Ambani. “Why is state providing security to such person when the rich can afford to hire private security personnel? If there is a threat perception then he must engage private security personnel. Private businessmen getting security is prevalent in Punjab but that culture has now gone to Mumbai.”

Harish Salve, appearing as amicus curiae , said Mr. Ambani had in fact sought an arms licence but that was not given.

The Centre then offered to provide him security.

“We are not concerned about the security of X, Y, Z persons but about the security of common man,” Justice Singhvi said. Expressing his anguish, he said, “Everyday we read in newspapers about rape of minor girls, five or six years, and such things would not happen if the common man felt safe.” When Mr. Salve drew the court’s attention to VIPs from other States coming to Delhi…

(Continued on Page 8)


  • “Why is state providing security to such person when rich can afford to hire private security personnel?”

  • A mechanism must be created to assess security threat of VIPs: Bench


  • More In: Today's Paper