Court warns of ‘stern action’ against former Army Chief

print   ·   T  T  

“You are increasing my work”: Judge

Former Army Chief General V. K. Singh was on Monday ticked off by a Delhi court for filing a separate application seeking permanent exemption from personal appearance before it in a criminal defamation case against him and warned of “stern action”.

Metropolitan Magistrate Jay Thareja said General Singh was increasing the court’s workload as he should have moved the plea for permanent exemption at the same time when the other four serving officials, also accused in the case, had filed similar applications.

“I will take a stern action against him (V. K. Singh). You are moving this application now. You should have filed it earlier along with the other accused…. You are increasing my work. Now I would have to pass a separate order for this application (with a similar plea),” the Judge told the former Army chief’s counsel.

Lt Gen (Retd) Tejinder Singh had filed a criminal defamation case against V. K. Singh, Vice-Chief of Army S. K. Singh, Lt Gen B. S. Thakur (Director General of Military Intelligence), Major General S. L. Narasimhan (Additional Director-General of Public Information) and Colonel Hitten Sawhney.

The complainant had alleged that he was defamed by the Army through its press release issued on March 5 which accused him of offering a bribe of Rs.14 crore to the then Army Chief to clear a deal of 600 trucks, a charge refuted by him.

The court asked counsel for the complainant to file his reply on V. K. Singh’s application on November 1.

Meanwhile, the court granted V. K. Singh exemption from personal appearance for the day only. The other four Army officers were earlier granted permanent exemption from personal appearance with the condition that they will have to appear before it on the day of framing of charges.

The complainant, however, opposed non-appearance of all five accused. - PTI



Recent Article in NATIONAL

Drug seizure

Mumbai police await Coast Guard report

The Mumbai police are yet to receive any intimation from the Coast Guard on the r... »