Violence in Belfast driven by few who feel ignored

John Kampfner
print   ·   T  T  

Unionists who believe they have nothing to lose in the new-look Northern Ireland are feeling more marginalised than ever

Old wounds:A man throws a piece of furniture during a clash between unionist protesters and riot police in North Belfast, Northern Ireland, on July 13. —Photo: AFP
Old wounds:A man throws a piece of furniture during a clash between unionist protesters and riot police in North Belfast, Northern Ireland, on July 13. —Photo: AFP

I remember in the late 1990s driving around the “bad lands” of south Armagh. The border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic was porous. I had read enough about the gun-running and the terrorist groups operating in the area, but what struck me most were the houses, the cars and the satellite dishes.

Back in Belfast, a U.K. government minister explained. Part of the tactic over the years, he said, was to make the warring sides more comfortable. The more they had to lose personally, the less they would be prone to fight.

Model attempt

Many around the world cite Northern Ireland as the model attempt at conflict resolution. Protestants and Catholics share power at Stormont, with Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness seemingly enjoying each other’s company as First Minister and his deputy.

Groups from South Africa to the Basque country are eager to learn the secrets of its success. That is why each outbreak of violence, such as this weekend’s during the Orange Order marching season (after police tried to enforce a ban on marching through a Catholic republican area of Belfast during the annual July 12 march) is so damaging. Each episode opens old wounds and begs a question that the political establishments in Belfast, London and Dublin would rather not be asked. Northern Ireland is safe, and welcoming to visitors. But can reconciliation ever be achieved, or is it just a veneer? Each year the parades are a potential flashpoint, particularly as many, as if by right, follow routes that take them through Catholic enclaves. Outsiders who have witnessed the bizarre old-fashioned rituals around the marches struggle to understand the passions that surround King Billy’s epic victory over the Catholics more than 300 years ago on the “Glorious Twelfth”, July 12, 1690.

As the July marching season approaches, communities brace themselves for problems. What happened last December was arguably more worrying because it did not follow an established pattern.

The violence that followed a decision by Belfast city council to change its policy of permanently flying the union flag led to more than a month of violence, much of it in the city centre — the modern, non-sectarian part of the city that businesses and tourism officials like to project as having moved on from the Troubles.

Some unionists see in the restrictions on their marches and the curtailment of the flag a link — and an attack on their identity. It is, they say, a mixture of elitism, political engineering and demographics. Belfast city council now has more nationalist members than unionist. The parades commission, they insist, is cleaving in the direction of an establishment that no longer looks after their interests.

As for economics, academic research is inconclusive. Throughout the Troubles, downturns did not appear to make matters better or worse. Yet in the 15 years since the Good Friday agreement, the new establishment has become so successful that those who do not support the principles underlying it feel more marginalised now than ever. That means those unionists who have not benefited from, or claim not to have benefited from, the new-look Northern Ireland. Some, but by no means all, are economically marginalised.

What they share is a sense of disenfranchisement, a concern that it is only a matter of time before Protestants become a minority in “their own country”. That poses a grave danger because if people feel they have nothing to lose, that they have gained little from “peace”, they will lash out.

Again, emotions are getting in the way of logic. On one level, the peace established by the politicians is durable. The prospects of anything approaching a return to the Troubles are remote. However, the components for persistent inter-communal strife are all in place. The number of “peace walls” in Northern Ireland has increased since the Good Friday agreement. These are blots on the landscape (though they are a regular source of income for taxi drivers from foreign tourists), with the tallest coming in at six metres, and the longest stretching for miles.

At a meeting last month with Mr. Robinson and Mr. McGuinness, David Cameron promised more investment if the walls started to come down.

Then there are the walls of the mind. Only seven per cent of pupils attend integrated schools. During the recent G8 summit in Northern Ireland, Barack Obama called for more integration. According to a Belfast Telegraph poll, more than two-thirds of the local population agrees.

Yet the onus put on faith schools by successive governments in London does not provide the necessary incentive. The responsibilities, and perks, of office have taken the sting out of the political elite on both sides of the divide. That is huge progress.

However, this does not mean that peace has been embedded in the minds of the angry few who feel ignored. — © Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2013



Recent Article in INTERNATIONAL

Rev. Libby Lane

Church of England: first woman Bishop consecrated

The Church of England ended centuries of male-only leadership on Monday as Reverend Libby Lane became its first woman bishop in a ceremon... »