DEEPA ALEXANDER

The triumphs and disasters of the differently-abled in India are two ends of the spectrum. Amongthe 70 million disabled in our country are those who have conquered peaks, won gold at theParalympics and raced in Himalayan and desert car rallies. But millions more struggle to meetdaily challenges in a society that tends to portray the disabled as either heroes or victims withlittle or no access to their rightful resources. The proposed amendments to the Copyright Act(1957) are seen as restrictive and discriminatory, as the copyright exception, which aims atallowing persons with disability easy access to copyrighted material, applies only to certaintypes of disability. We spoke to activists who address these issues, not as charity or welfare, butas matters of development and dignity.

Implement their rights

A bility Foundation's thrust is on creating an equitable society. Through our magazine Success & Ability, we spread this message at a time when service to the disabled was seen only at the physical, and not at the emotional level. Persons with disabilities need access to inclusive education and employment. Being ‘accounted' in the Census 2011 will open up opportunities. Accurate data will enable Government intervention at various levels. We need ramps for wheelchair users, audio announcements in stations for the visually-impaired, and video announcements for the hearing-impaired. Floor numbers in Braille for lifts, sign language interpreters in every hospital and large-print books for those with low vision are the other needs. The implementation of the rights of persons with disabilities as per the United Nations convention and the Persons with Disabilities Act (PWD) is also essential.

JAYSHREE RAVEENDRAN

Founder and Honorary Executive Director, Ability Foundation, Chennai

A development issue

My daughter Tamana was born with cerebral palsy. It pushed me to found an organisation in 1984 to fulfil the dreams of children with special needs and those of their parents. Since Independence, the disabled have been categorised along with sections such as women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. While these have had powerful political lobbies, there has been no spokesperson for the disabled. The dichotomies between the Ministries of Education and Social Justice further worsen the exclusion. Most policy-makers look at disability as a welfare, not a development issue. Disability should be jointly addressed by the Ministries of Health, Women and Child Development, HRD, Social Justice and Empowerment. The definition of disability in the PWD Act does not include autism, which leaves out nearly two million autistic persons in India. Admitting disabled children in normal schools is not enough — you need to have professionally trained staff. I also hope for a different curriculum for special children.

Dr. SHAYAMA CHONA

President, Tamana, New Delhi

Public-private partnership

NGO-run establishments provide free schooling for disabled children. The Government has provided legislative intent through the Inclusive Education Act, which makes it mandatory to include all kinds of impaired children. However, Government schools that cater to the poor are generally marked by grossly inadequate infrastructure and teaching aids, so imagine the predicament of the disabled. I would like a public-private partnership for day-care and residential institutions which provide educational and recreational service on a long-term basis. We need to benefit from global expertise, and customise them to local needs. As Childline's primary mandate is child protection, I feel that the Government must compulsorily provide for a child protection policy in any institution that deals with disabled children, as, such children are more vulnerable to abuse.

KAJOL MENON

Executive Director, CHILDLINE India Foundation, Mumbai

The copyright angle

The Centre for Internet and Society is associated with the copyright amendment movement for persons with disabilities, and is one of the founding organisations for the Indian Right to Read campaign. At present, the proposed copyright amendment is detrimental to the disability sector's needs. The exception extends only to ‘specially designed' formats such as Braille and sign language, and does not benefit the millions who have cerebral palsy, dyslexia and low vision, and the visually-impaired persons who do not know Braille. For conversion to non-specialised formats, the amendment proposes a licensing system which will permit only organisations working for the benefit of the disabled to undertake conversion and distribution. This will prevent educational institutions, SHGs, NGOs and print-disabled individuals from undertaking conversion. The proposed amendment violates the Constitutional guarantee of equality under Article 14, since it discriminates between those visually-impaired persons who know Braille and those print-disabled persons who do not.

NIRMITA NARASIMHAN

Programme Manager, Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore

More In: METRO PLUS | FEATURES