Arrested development

print   ·   T  T  

Issue Those who use social media as a platform to express themselves should become familiar with Section 66A of the IT Act

Under every comment that is posted on Facebook (FB) there are three options: like, comment, or share. If you feel the comment is inappropriate you can report it as spam. In India there seems to be another option that is not on the page – the ‘arrest’ option.

This week, Shaheen Dhada (21) was arrested for a comment posted on FB and her friend Renu Srinivas was arrested for ‘liking’ the comment after the police received a complaint about it from a political leader.

What followed was an outcry on FB and Twitter over the arrests and also a sense of fear from some users as they wondered if the same could happen to them. Though Milind Deora, Minister of State, Communications and Information Technology, has tweeted support for the girls and an enquiry has been set up, with the girls are out on bail, the question still remains whether we should think twice before voicing our opinions online.

The growth of social media has given youth a space to voice their opinions. Once, people could only write letters to the editor of a newspaper to be heard. Now they can start a blog or tweet about it. With the growth of the Internet, young people have a platform to express themselves freely, invite comments and have a discussion on any topic. Raghav Mandava, a stand-up comic, says, “The arrest of the girls was stupid, to say the least. But I think freedom of speech is definitely a double-edged sword in this country. Primarily because the people who approved it are the same people who are sensitive little babies and cry havoc whenever something tickles.”

A perfect example of this was when a businessman from Pondicherry, Ravi Srinivasan, was picked up by the police after he tweeted about reports of corruption against a Union Minister’s son. D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, a senior lawyer in Vizag, clarified that it was unjust to arrest the girls under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act. “I personally feel that the post was not grossly offensive and the arrests were unwarranted,” he says. Section 66A deals with sending information through an electronic communication device. Some critics feel that the section goes against the freedom of speech guaranteed under the Constitution. Zain Saleh, a final-year law student, feels that the wording of the section is tough for the layman to understand. “The government should come out with some guidelines to make it clear to the common Internet user that they are not restricting freedom of speech but making provisions so that it is not misused. Even the police need to have these guidelines,” he opines.

Renu Srivastava, a family counsellor from Mumbai, says, “After the uncalled for arrests we have to think twice before posting something on Facebook.” There is still a sense of fear as people are unaware about the law.

The Internet is a powerful medium and it is very tough to censor it. It is for the community to keep a tab on what is being uploaded and who is saying what. At the end of the day freedom of speech and expression as guaranteed by our Constitution comes with reasonable restrictions. So next time you cry fire make sure you are being responsible.


The Hindu presents the all-new Young World



Recent Article in METRO PLUS

With a bangThe biopic on the boxer will have its world premiere at the international film festival

TIFF premiere for Mary Kom

The Priyanka Chopra-starrer will have its world premiere at the film festival »