![]() Thursday, Jul 17, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The Centre deserves appreciation for its decision not to despatch troops to Iraq against which the U.S. and the U.K. committed aggression for a regime change for "the good of the people there" without taking the U.N. into confidence. The Americans thought they would be welcomed by the Iraqis. But what is happening there has belied their expectations. The forces are in trouble as there is widespread insurgency. They need a stabilising force. That is why India was invited. There were certain temptations to send our troops the U.S. President, George W. Bush, would prevail upon the Pakistan President, Pervez Musharraf, to see reason on the issue of cross-border terrorism; the U.S. would help India in getting a permanent seat in the U.N. Security Council and India would be awarded contracts. But we understood that expecting the Americans to pressure Islamabad to behave would be living in a fool's paradise. The U.S. may or may not relish our stand, but we have made the right decision, one that serves our national interest. We have learnt from the bitter experience of the Indian Peace Keeping Force in Sri Lanka.
K.L. Batra,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|