![]() Thursday, Apr 10, 2003 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Special Correspondent
Replying to supplementaries, Mr. Advani refused to be drawn into a discussion on whether the setting up of the Committee was an admission on the part of the Government that the allegations of misuse were correct. The question was raised by Alka Balram Kshatriya (Cong.) who sought to know whether setting up of a committee meant that the Government agree that there was misuse of POTA. Mr. Advani said the Committee was constituted taking cognisance of the allegations made on the floor of the House. Independent member, Shabana Azmi sought to know whether many people in Gujarat were booked for the Godhra carnage but no one arrested for the bloodshed that followed. While several members were on their feet, the Leader of the Opposition, Manmohan Singh, questioned the reason for a change in the Government affadavit in the Supreme Court on the issue of arrest of the MDMK leader, Vaiko, under POTA. He said the reply to Ms. Azmi's query was ``not satisfactory''. Mr. Advani said the Committee was expected to take a comprehensive view of the use of the Act in all States, complaints, grievances and any cases referred to it for review. It would also suggest measures to ensure that provisions of the Act were invoked for combating terrorism only and not other crimes. ``You should not expect me to usurp the authority of the Review Committee,'' he said. In reply to another query, Mr. Advani said the Centre had not referred any case to the Committee.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|