![]() Thursday, Apr 03, 2003 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By J. Venkatesan
While Mr. Vaiko had questioned the validity of Sec. 21 of the Act under which he was arrested on July 11 last, the People's Union for Civil Liberties and the All-India Human Rights and Social Justice Front had questioned the validity of the entire Act. Senior counsel for PUCL, Rajinder Sachar, today gave a brief outline before a Bench comprising Justice S. Rajendra Babu and Justice G.P. Mathur as to how various provisions were violative of the Constitution. He also contended that the law lacked legislative competence and violated the international covenants. He will continue his arguments tomorrow.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|