![]() Tuesday, Mar 04, 2003 |
| National | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Legal Correspondent
A Bench, comprising Justice Y.K. Sabharwal and Justice H.K. Sema, asked the Attorney-General, Soli Sorabjee, to file the Centre's response in two weeks giving reasons for pruning the list. It also wanted the Centre to indicate whether the supply of grains for the food-for-work programme for BPL families had been substantially reduced. Mr. Sorabjee informed the court that adequate budgetary allocation had been made in the recent budget to give effect to the project. On behalf of the petitioner it was submitted that the grain supply to a BPL family had been reduced from 10 kg to five kg a day and the number of workdays from 30 days in a month to 10 days. The counsel said that this would hurt most the poorest of the poorwho had nothing to fend for themselves and urged the court to direct the Government to earmark 20 metric tonnes of foodgrains every year for the food-for-work programme.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|