![]() Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003 |
| Front Page | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Front Page
By Javed Ansari
The Congress president, Sonia Gandhi, in a letter to Dr. Kalam, has registered her party's protest against the move to instal the portrait. She has pointed out that the boycott decision was not out of any disrespect for him. In addition to Ms. Gandhi's letter, the Congress also released a statement voicing its protest. It said that ``Savarkar's petition seeking mercy from the British, his advocacy of the two-nation theory and his alleged association with the assassins of Mahatma Gandhi, make it extremely inappropriate that his portrait be put up in the same hallowed precincts as those of other freedom fighters''. Other Opposition leaders, including Rashid Alvi (BSP), have, in a letter, objected to the decision on the grounds that ``Savarkar was an accused in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi and had submitted a mercy petition to the British authorities, besides being a supporter of Mohammed Ali Jinnah's two-nation theory.'' Providing the rationale for the boycott decision, the leaders pointed out that their association ``will give credibility to the activities and the divisive policies of V.D. Savarkar''. The signatories to the letter include the former Prime Minister, Deve Gowda (JDS), Somnath Chatterjee, CPI(M), Mulayam Singh Yadav (SP), Rashid Alvi (BSP), E. Ahamad (IUML), Francis George, S. Ramachandran Pillay, CPI(M), Amar Roy Pradhan (AIFB), Manoj Bhattacharya and Birsingh Mahato (RSP). The deputy leader of the Congress Parliamentary Party, Shivraj Patil, chief whip of the party in the Rajya Sabha, Pranab Mukherjee and Mr. Somnath Chatterjee are members of the joint committee on installation of portraits and statues of national leaders. All three and J. Chittaranjan of the CPI were present at the meeting of the committee in December in which the decision to instal the portrait was taken.
`A case of afterthought'
The BJP spokesperson, V.K. Malhotra, said the Opposition reaction was a clear case of afterthought. He said the minutes of the meeting clearly showed that none of those present at the meeting raised any objection. The Parliamentary Affairs Minister, Sushma Swaraj, said the set procedure was duly followed. ``Nobody protested or dissented when the committee met and the minutes were circulated. To protest and create a controversy now is not right,'' she told the media. Mr. Chatterjee today conceded that he had erred in not being vocal in his protest at the committee meeting. ``It was a big mistake. I should have been more strident in my protest,'' he said. Both Mr. Mukherjee and Mr. Shivraj Patil were not available for comments. The Congress spokesperson, Jaipal Reddy, had a tough time defending the stand taken by two senior leaders of the party. ``As the deliberations of the parliamentary committees are confidential I cannot comment on what transpires at the meeting.''
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|