Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002

About Us
Contact Us
International
News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

International Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

U.S. set to present new resolution

By Sridhar Krishnaswami

United Nations OCT. 21. The United States is getting ready to formally present its new resolution on Iraq; but the impression is that there is still some distance to be travelled in meeting some of the concerns of the Permanent Members of the Security Council, notably France.

For the record, the Bush administration has been taking the line that it has the authority to act against Iraq, but ground realities over the last two weeks have forced a re-think in the Republican administration's stance. Veto-wielding members in the Security Council refused to subscribe to an earlier draft resolution that had an automatic trigger clause on the use of force in case Iraq and its leader, Saddam Hussein, defied the United Nations weapons inspectors and their programme. Under the current scheme of things, the U.S. will present its resolution in the early part of the week; and the Secretary of State, Colin Powell, appeared confident that it will have support. A total of nine votes out of the 15-member Council is required to get a resolution through, and none of the Permanent Members can cast a veto. "I think it's a resolution that will draw good support from the Security Council'', Gen. Powell remarked on Sunday. He said Washington believed that the U.S. and other "like-minded'' nations "will have all the authority it needs'' if Mr. Hussein refuses to permit the inspections team. It is still unclear if the Bush administration will agree to the French proposal on a two-phase resolution, the second with respect to the use of force coming only after the inspectors have reported a failed mission.

Gen. Powell has stressed that there would have to be a linkage to the "consequences''. But basically, the Secretary of State has argued that use of force could come about in one of two ways: the United Nations acting as a group; or the U.S. and "like-minded'' nations taking on Iraq. The final language of the U.S. draft resolution is being worked on and debated among diplomats. Some are concerned that the Bush administration insists on saying that Iraq is in "material breach'' of its obligations under U.N. resolutions. International law specialists and some diplomats are worried that the U.S. will use the term "material breach'' to come back later and say that the original authorisation of the U.N. use of force against Iraq in the aftermath of its invasion of Kuwait in 1990 is still valid.

A country like France, for instance, is insistent that any authorisation on the use of force against Iraq will require a new U.N. resolution.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

International

News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Copyright © 2002, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu