![]() Thursday, Oct 10, 2002 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Tamil Nadu
By Our Special Correspondent
``I have been falsely implicated in the case out of political vendetta. Ultimately, the truth will prevail,'' Mr. Vaiko said as he emerged from the court here. Mr. Vaiko was earlier produced before the judge of the Sessions Court For Exclusive Trail of Bomb Blast Cases, L. Rajendran, on the expiry of a five-day remand extension given on October 4. He has so far spent 90 days in prison, ever since he was arrested under the POTA for a pro-LTTE speech he made at Tirumangalam, near Madurai. The Special Public Prosecutor, S. Jayakumar, sought a 50-day extension of the remand as the investigation was yet to be completed. G. Devadoss, defence counsel, argued that the `lethargic' prosecution was taking its own time to complete the investigation. Extension of remand was ``neither a formality nor automatic''. Also, the public prosecutor's report had not been made available to him, as mandated. The SPP, who took exception to the use of the word `lethargic', charged defence with `tampering' with probe proceedings. To this, producing a report on `Q' branch investigations, which appeared in these columns, defence contended that it was the prosecution, which was meddling and using the press. The judge asked the SPP whether all exercises being undertaken now would form part of evidence, and reminded him that though the prosecution could take time to complete the investigations, there was a ``ceiling'' on how long the defendant could be held.
Support for general strike
Later, talking to presspersons, Mr. Vaiko said his party was in support of the general strike called today on the Cauvery issue. It was the responsibility of the Centre to intervene and fulfil the just hopes and aspirations of Tamil Nadu. The strike was to fight for the rights of Tamil Nadu. ``We are not begging, only asking for what is rightfully ours.'' On the ordinance banning forcible conversions, he said the majority community should come forward to fight this measure. This was against the principles of democracy and secularism, on which the country was founded. ``Protection of minorities is the essence of democracy'' and this ordinance went against that spirit.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|