|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, November 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
Can Saudi Arabia cope?
By C. Raja Mohan
NEW DELHI, NOV. 6. One of the casualties of the current American
military campaign against Afghanistan has been the traditional
silence in the United States on the internal politics of Saudi
Arabia and the sources of support to extremism within the
Kingdom.
The U.S. has had no desire to put Saudi Arabia, the world's most
important producer of oil and a crucial ally of the United States
in the Persian Gulf, to public scrutiny. Until now.
With growing evidence that some recruiting, financing and
planning for the September 11 attacks against the United States
took place on Saudi soil, the American media is turning a
critical spot light on the desert kingdom.
As the U.S. delves deeper into the connections between
international terrorist networks and their links within Saudi
Arabia, there is a popular American disenchantment with the
regime that is finding expression within the U.S. media and the
political class.
Meanwhile, Crown Prince Abdullah, who runs the day-to- day
affairs of the kingdom, in a rare move has publicly hit back at
American media criticism of Saudi policies.
Saudi Arabia is caught in a big fix. It is perceived by many
Muslims within and outside the Kingdom as having sold out to the
United States. And within the United States there is anger that
the Saudis who depend on American protection are not doing enough
in this war against international terrorism.
The regime is the principal enemy of Osama bin Laden who has
called for its ouster. Osama turned against the Saudi regime when
it agreed to host American forces during the Gulf war against
Iraq a decade ago. Riyadh in turn has stripped Osama of his Saudi
citizenship.
But the popular American frustration with the Saudi reluctance to
either confront the sources of Islamic extremism within or
enthusiastically back American war against international
terrorism is real and growing.
But within the American establishment there is considerable
sensitivity to the difficult dilemmas facing the Saudi Kingdom.
Per capita incomes have nearly halved in the Kingdom over the
last two decades, which has seen a decline in oil revenues and a
rapidly growing population. High unemployment and increasing
political dissent have degraded political support to the House of
Saud which has ruled the kingdom for nearly a century.
Crown Prince Abdullah is reported to have stated publicly that
President George Bush had assured him over the telephone that he
sharply disagrees with the public criticism of the regime in the
United States.
The real concern in the U.S. may not be about the level of
present Saudi support for the war against the Taliban, but the
long-term stability of the regime. The U.S. establishment is said
to be debating the prospects of an Iranian-style Islamic
revolution that could overthrow the House of Saud.
The U.S. is acutely conscious of the grave consequences of
Islamic extremists of the Osama kind getting control over Saudi
Arabia and its vast oil riches. That would transform the
geopolitics of the Middle East as well as international energy
markets and give a big boost to international terrorism.
Some American analysts see the present war is as much about
ensuring the survival of the Saudi regime as it is about
eliminating the terrorist networks in Afghanistan. It is also
about finding ways to promote much needed internal change in the
Kingdom without destabilising it.
Crown Prince Abdullah has often been accused of being anti-
American for his strong criticism of U.S. failure to push Israel
into a peace settlement with the Palestinians. He has refused to
travel to Washington this year despite repeated invitations from
the Bush Administration.
Paradoxically, his reputation for maintaining distance from the
United States might give Crown Prince Abdullah the much needed
political space to manage the current contradictions facing the
Kingdom. The U.S. will indeed be praying for his success.
The House of Saud would have counted for nothing but for its
extraordinary survival instincts. Through a mixture of
accommodation and coercion, flexibility and toughness, the Saudi
regime has defied all political odds. If it fails to cope this
time, there will be hell to pay all around.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Bureaucratic bungling | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|