|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, November 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
RTC impasse continues
By W. Chandrakanth
HYDERABAD, NOV. 6. The APSRTC strike continued on the 23rd day
without any breakthrough and both the Government and the JAC
remained firm on their stand. Though the Chief Minister, Mr.
N.Chandrababu Naidu, had left the issue to the Cabinet Sub-
Committee, there was no fresh initiative from the members to
invite the JAC for talks nor did the JAC make any attempts at
resolving the issue.
There are indications that if the Government concedes a bit more
than the Rs.100 crore it had offered now to the JAC, there could
an amicable settlement. Having come thus far, a little yielding
would help ease the people's problems. The JAC is keen on
securing at least 15 per cent wage hike but there are pointers
that it might settle for a little less.
Sacrifice, if any, has to come from both sides in the interest of
the people and the corporation. There could be some settlement if
the Government moves up a bit on wage revision and the JAC scales
down a little. On other demands, a sincere effort must begin to
infuse financial health back into the organisation.
Experts like Dr.Y. Satyanarayana, ONGC Chair Professor in Energy
Management at ASCI, suggest selective concessions which are need-
based to people. He says students of Government schools,
physically challenged and senior citizens with green cards could
be entitled for concessions but not all and sundry.
Trade unions and managements also must bring down the expenditure
under the head of salaries to much lower than the present one of
about 41 per cent. The private sector spends not more than 20 per
cent, he points out with a bus-staff ratio of 4, his recent study
indicates.
His study also reveals that transport undertakings in Europe and
USA like the Greyhound in USA and London Transport in UK are
employing about three persons per bus. It means automated fare
collection systems and outsourcing most of the non-core
activities, especially in maintenance, advance reservation and
bus station management would be in place.
A target bus-staff ratio of 4 (2.5 drivers and conductors and 1.5
in traffic and maintenance and administration) and a wage bill of
not more than 35 per cent of the earnings could enable the RTC to
compete and sustain.
However, without reducing the burden on APSRTC imposed through
the concessions and irrational MV Tax such pruning measures would
be of no use. There must be a more rational tax structure.
The MV Tax in AP was on per seat per quarter basis till April
1993 with a similar system being in place for private buses.
Later it was changed to percentage of earnings basis for APSRTC.
In 1992-93, the cost per km on taxes was 52.2 paise but increased
to Rs.1.67 paise per km in 2000-2001. Senior officials in the RTC
admit that the heavy MV Tax on RTC buses had made the commuters
shift to other modes of travel. The JAC is demanding at least a
uniform 10 per cent.
Reports of the organisation and Dr.Satyanarayana's study indicate
that on an average 128.53 lakh passengers travelled daily on its
17,233 buses in 1997-98 but the same came down to 110.61 lakh in
2000-2001, while the fleet strength grew to 19,219 buses. This 20
lakh drop in the numbers meant overall earnings per km of
Rs.12.61, while the cost per km was Rs.13.13 km resulting in a
loss of 97 paise for every km operated.
The cost per km increased from 39.1 paise per km in 1980-81 to
167 paise per km in 2000-2001. Wages rose from 30 per cent of
total costs to 39 per cent during this period.
The APSRTC began functioning in 1932 with 27 vehicles and now is
the best transport service in the world carrying about 1.2 crore
passengers daily and employing 1.30 lakh persons.
There is no point in just increasing the MV Tax on private buses
as going by the admission of officials, the private operators
might pay for one bus but would run at least four more on the
same permit illegally. Hence, the drive against illegal vehicles
should be 100 per cent. There cannot be any compromise on this.
Does anyone see reason?
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : `Bid to introduce M.Sc. in food-processing in ANGRAU' Next : Hefty pay hike for archakas | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|