|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, November 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
'National security above press freedom'
By J. Venkatesan
NEW DELHI, NOV. 6. The Law Commission has reiterated its earlier
stand that a stringent terrorism law with necessary safeguards
against its misuse is essential to effectively deal with cross-
border terrorism.
According to Commission sources, the act of terrorism by its very
nature generates terror and a fear psychosis among the people,
who are afraid to render any assistance to the police in
furnishing information about terrorists.
Referring to a provision in the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance
(POTO) that any person (which also includes journalists) is bound
to furnish information on terrorists to the police, the sources
citing the Commission's report on terrorism law released last
year, feel that such a provision is necessary.
In its report, the Commission said ``it is difficult to get any
witnesses because people are afraid of their own safety and
safety of their families'' and hence placing an obligation upon
persons receiving or in possession of information as to any
terrorist activity to inform the police as soon as practicable.
The Commission is of the view that ``incorporation of such a
provision does not mean that any or every person not giving
information would necessarily be punished''.
Referring the criticism from the media that this provision is
inconsistent with the freedom of press, the Commission noted that
in India, freedom of press ``flows from Article 19 (1)(a) of the
Constitution and it has been repeatedly held by the Supreme Court
that rights and privileges of the press are no greater than that
of any of the citizens of India''. The Commission noted that even
in the U.K. and the U.S., no immunity in favour of
journalists/press is recognised. It cited a U.S. Supreme Court
ruling, according to which guarantee of freedom of the press,
does not immunise the press to render assistance to the
investigation of crimes which obligation lies on every citizen.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Funds for beedi workers' hospital project in T.N. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|