|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, September 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Terrorist attacks
Sir, - What would have been the reaction of the world if the
terrorists had attacked a militarily weak nation instead of the
U.S.? Would then the major nations of the world get united to
fight terrorism as they have done following the attacks on the
U.S. last weak? Presumably, the answer is `no'.
Most nations then would have condemned the attacks but would have
taken no effort to exercise their military might to suppress
terrorism. The advanced nations have been turning a deaf ear to
India's appeal of combating terrorism and, over the years, we
have been fighting the battle alone. The genuine reason why most
of the nations have so meekly endorsed America's mission of
fighting terrorism and its resolution to attack Afghanistan is
because they not only want to win the goodwill of the U.S., but
also because of the threat as made by the U.S. Secretary of
State, Gen. Colin Powell, that when asked for help the nations
are either with them or against them.
What has been done to the U.S. is wrong and its people richly
deserve our sympathy and the war against terrorism is well
justified. But the U.S. must keep in mind that the war against
terrorism should not be concentrated on Afghanistan, Osama bin
Laden and his group, nor should this war come to an end if the
U.S. succeeds in trapping Osama. The war against terrorism would
be a war for humanity and it should continue.
Sutirtha Sahariah,
New Delhi
Sir, - No nation took India seriously when we sought help to
fight terrorism. Now, all are crying for revenge. The Indian
Government should have advised the Americans to have a dialogue
with terrorists and nations harbouring them. Instead, our
Government has offered all-out support to the Americans in their
plans for war against terrorism which is bound to fail in the
long run.
Dr. B.R.L. Prasad,
Gannavaram (A.P)
Sir, - No doubt the recent terrorist attacks on the U.S. are a
blow to humanity. But hasn't America laid the foundation for such
terrorist acts? The first act of terrorism performed by the U.S.
which led to vast destruction was the bombardment of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. These questions are never asked by any country as
the U.S. is a superpower and nobody wants to indulge in a fight
with it.
Babur Rayyan,
Aligarh
Sir, - Unable to deny the evidence of terrorist camps in Pakistan
presented by India to the U.S., supplemented by evidence already
with the U.S., Gen. Pervez Musharraf lashed out at India, giving
vent to his frustration and admission at being arm-twisted by the
U.S., warning that if Islamabad failed to cooperate it would
treat Pakistan as harbouring terrorists, endangering the
country's vital installations.
The Indian aim of highlighting terrorism has been achieved and
now it is time for ``quiet, behind the scene diplomacy'', and not
to annoy the U.S; now focussed on Osama/Taliban.
Geographically the role we can play in the present crisis is
minimum! No need to panic or indulge in ``one-upmanship''
diplomacy with Pakistan, now.
Brig. (retd.) V.R.P. Sarathy,
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : The verdict Next : Indira Gandhi's arrest | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|