|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, September 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
HC won't stay local bodies poll
By A. Subramani
CHENNAI, SEPT. 21. The Madras High Court today declined to stay
the process of elections to local bodies, and permitted the
Government to go ahead with poll as planned for on October 16 and
18.
Rejecting a batch of petitions seeking to postpone the elections,
the First Bench comprising the Chief Justice Mr. B.S. Reddy and
Mr. Justice K.P. Sivasubramaniam, however, re-scheduled the
process, which would now start on September 24.
As per the revised schedule, the filing of nominations will begin
with the publication of poll notification on September 24, while
the last date for filing nominations will be October 1. Scrutiny
will be done on October 3 and the last date for the withdrawals
is October 5.
Addressing the petitioners' grievance over the electoral rolls,
the Bench said those voters who were enlisted for the
Parliamentary elections during October 1999 and who did not find
a place on the rolls now despite having photo identity cards
should be allowed to vote after due verification.
The enlistment of eligible voters shall start today and continue
till October 1. The process should be given due publicity in the
electronic and print media, and also by publication of this right
in all village panchayats, taluk offices and Collectorates.
The Bench pointed out that the Constitution was not specific
about the rotation of seats reserved for Scheduled Caste
candidates, and said, ``that is left to the State''.
The rotation system, which is to be followed in the coming civic
elections, could not be said either to be ``unconstitutional or
illegal''.
On the reservation percentage itself, the Bench said, ``it is not
made out before us by any clinching material that there is any
violation in the said fixation of seats for reserved
candidates''.
Rejecting another contention that the Chennai Mayor post ought to
have been reserved for an SC candidate, the Bench said a reading
of the relevant provisions of the law did not show any such
requirement.
The order also cited various pronouncements of the apex court,
``which were the law of the land''.
The Advocate-General of Tamil Nadu, Mr. N.R. Chandran, and the
Government Pleader, Mr. Raghupathy, were present in the court to
receive the orders on behalf of the Government and the State
Election Commission.
The writ petitions, separately filed by Mr. Janardhanam and five
others since September 18, listed various grievances, including
flawed rolls and the Government's ``failure'' to adhere to laws
on rotation of reserved seats.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Allies stand by Jayalalithaa, foes hail judgment Next : Recruitment of PG assistants stayed | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|