|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
Why Mamata can't protest fare hike
By Malabika Bhattacharya
KOLKATA, SEPT. 1. After her return to the National Democratic
Alliance (NDA) signalling a virtual surrender to pressure, the
Trinamool
Congress chief, Ms. Mamata Banerjee, finds herself at the
receiving end over an issue which she as the Railway Minister
exploited to her advantage. The anger in West Bengal over the
steep hike in railway fares effected a few days ago by the
Railway Minister, Mr. Nitish Kumar, is being deftly orchestrated
by the ruling communists as well as the Congress, Ms. Banerjee's
arch-rivals, with the twin-objective of attacking the Centre and
Ms. Banerjee.
Ms. Banerjee, who perceives a roadblock in Mr. Nitish Kumar, is
extremely unhappy over the fare hike about which she knew
beforehand because it occurred at a time when she was
``planning'' to wrest back her old portfolio. Given her penchant
for agitation, she could have either offered to resign or hit the
road with yet another agitation. But the ground realities are
such that she can do neither.
Nobody knows it better than Ms. Banerjee that the NDA partners,
who swallowed their pride and accepted her back in their midst
only at the Prime Minister's behest, would not tolerate her if
she raises the fare hike issue. She had made herself
``unavailable'' for comment in Parliament and outside on the
railway fare hike. She deftly wriggled out at the last moment of
all post-hike public engagements. Her shadow, Mr. Sudip
Bandopadhyay, the Trinamool chief whip, in Parliament, was
permitted to make some customary noises.
``If she (Ms. Banerjee) were the Railway Minister, this hike
would not have taken place . But, we believe the critical issue
of safety for railway passengers forced the hike,'' says Mr.
Bandopadhyay.
In Bengal, the ruling Left Front and the Opposition party,
Congress, while enjoying Ms. Banerjee's acute discomfort,
organised a string of demonstrations. None of them was directly
aimed at Mr. Kumar, who is believed to be enjoying warm relations
with both the denominations. A measure of the Leftists' good
equations with Mr. Kumar was available on Thursday when Mr.
Basudev Acharya, the Communist Party of India(Marxist) MP, said
that the public sector wagon builders, so far starved of orders,
had been assured of bulk orders for wagons by Mr. Kumar.
For Ms. Banerjee, the current situation is unenviable because of
several factors. First, she is increasingly realising to her
chagrin that in the three months following the May elections, the
ruling Communists have cleverly marginalised her and the
Trinamool in the overall scheme of things by giving Bengal an
immensely responsive and fleet-footed Government headed by Mr.
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee as well as a modern and caring party
organisation. Working in tandem in pursuit of a prosperous and
developed Bengal, the two have largely succeeded in rolling back
the ``culture of political violence'' that they say Ms.
Banerjee's Trinamool has sought to incorporate into Bengal before
the May Assembly polls.
The findings of opinion polls, carried on Mr. Bhattacharjee's 100
days in office last week, and affinity for the Bhattacharjee's
Government have come to Ms. Banerjee as a jarring revelation that
she is increasingly going out of the reckoning in her own
backyard. She cannot train her guns on Mr. Bhattacharjee or party
bosses such as Mr. Anil Biswas or Mr. Biman Bose, because their
image of being clean, committed and fair-minded is very much
intact.
By contrast, the regular media expose on the Trinamool's drift,
intellectual bankruptcy and, above all, involvement of many of
its functionaries in criminal activities has made Ms. Banerjee's
party a suspect in popular imagination. Many of Trinamool's 60 or
so MLAs are uncomfortable after realising that the minorities
forming the spine of their votebank perceive her return to the
NDA as a ``betrayal'' because they had decided to back her before
the polls when they saw her teamed up with the Congress. The
rupture of the relationship with the Congress amounts to a
betrayal, they feel.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : 11 killed in accident | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|