|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Scandal dotcom
SEVANTI NINAN
Last fortnight, new media got its come-uppance from the old. The
Indian Express said Tehelka had resorted to even more dirty
tricks in bringing us their great expose, than the ones we
already knew about. One of their reporters had been handed the
transcripts of some Tehelka tapes that had not been aired in
public so far, and these told us that the great champions of
anti-corruption had used not just money and wine to uncover graft
in the Defence Ministry, but women as well.
The resulting uproar has been a really curious one. The Great
Indian Middle Class apparently thinks that this is no big deal,
judging from both Net polls and straw polls. The Mighty Indian
Media claims to be appalled. This, it has been thundering through
newspaper editorials and TV panels, is not journalism. What will
self-styled champions of investigative journalism license
themselves to do next?
And between the two you have Tehelka which in a space of five
days niftily changed its position on whether it was the right
thing to have done, and its version of the truth. But the bottom
line is that it video-taped commercial sex workers, at least one
of them without their knowledge, and it also used at least one of
its own staffers in this episode, a stenographer working with
Aniruddh Bahl, but turned extremely vague on what her role was.
We are certainly getting into previously uncharted journalistic
territory over here.
It is worth asking - what does Tehelka as an instantly successful
media brand represent for Indian journalism? What methods,
values, goals?
At the time of writing, this dotcom is 14 months old. In that
space of time it has achieved brand recognition all over the
world, though thanks to its unconventional methods its fortunes
have not touched the same height as its fame. But in a world in
which perception counts more than performance the perception is
that it is a gutsy, stylish dotcom with b---s. That one word
pretty much sums up the basis for Tehleka's appeal to the under-
35 online community. (Just sample the chat room talk, and the
Usenet postings on Tehelka.)
In fact, long before Operation Westend, by the time it was six
months old in December 2000, it was already one of the top five
Indian sites in the world, and according to some industry
ratings, the leading Indian site in North America. On the basis
of its dubious tactics in using Manoj Prabhakar to blow the
whistle on Indian cricketers by engaging them in conversation and
taping them, and presumably also on the basis of its erotic
reader and its literary section. Nobody online or offline has
quite the same class of literary biggies writing for them.
That was in December 2000. March 2001 of course brought other
pickings, in the shape of one cabinet ministerial head, and those
of two party chiefs, both parties that were part of the ruling
coalition. Not bad going for a nine-month-old dot com.
So what makes Tehelka different from the rest of the hack
community? It looks and sounds different, for one. Thanks to its
adventures, its chief now has the same category of security as
Sonia Gandhi. So you have this trendy office, with its bilious
green frontage marred somewhat by a wall of sandbags, with cops
positioned behind them. Its glass frontage has a series of no-
entry-without-permission signs. More colour inside: mauve steps,
magenta banisters. And more cops.
Tehelka looks different, and Tarun Tejpal sounds different. No
other editor in Indian journalism sports the kind of accent he
has. Or professes the same methods. "I think sting journalism is
completely legitimate in a country like India where brazenness
has touched completely new heights, ya." Will they use spycams
again? You bet they will.
To get Tehelka this far this soon he has used both spycams and
celebrities. Other journalistic establishments in this country do
not have
V.S. Naipaul and Amitabh Bachchan sitting on their boards. Why
this name collecting? Well you know, small organisation, it
needed the ballast, he says. And what do these eminences think of
Tehelka's girlie games? They have not been in touch, he says.
Conventional media empires get their money from circulation, ad
sales and the market. Tehelka is dependent almost entirely on
private placement of its shares and finding strategic partners.
When investors turned chary of its taking on the Government, (Zee
backed out after a few months of negotiations) it tried to cash
in on its public support by launching a Tehelka Investigation
fund and proposing grandly that every donation of Rs. 1,000 would
amount to the purchase of a single share. But then it discovered
that the law does not permit such innovative financing. So the
fund got something from the public, but not much. Now he is
waiting to nail down sundry non-resident Indians who have
professed interest in Tehelka during a June road show in the
U.S.. Meanwhile staffers get paid, but contributors do not.
It has also tried selling its content, to the Hindujas among
others. Other than that, Tejpal swears that his defence
corruption fighting company has had no truck with the band of
brothers implicated in India's last big defence scam, Bofors. "I
have never met, spoken to, or written to the Hindujas in my
life."
Conventional media outfits do not list erotica among their
content offerings. Tejpal says he genuinely believes that there
is room for stylish erotica but the hypocrisy of the Indian
establishment led him to take off his erotic reader after the
Government got after him in March, because it could give a handle
for legal action against Tehelka.
And conventional media outfits peddle dubious investigative
stories with less alacrity than Tehelka does. Last fortnight it
carried the story that a Congress (I) leader had paid a hefty sum
to the young woman who claimed she was Mahanta's second wife. It
then retracted it after Tejpal enquired and found the reporter
had no hard evidence. Earlier a strange story on Chandrababu
Naidu had the CEO of Andhra Pradesh protesting. Checks and
balances, says Tehelka's CEO, will now be in place. No shoddy
investigation and no more dubious use of women in the pursuit of
journalism. The heat of recent events has led him to discover the
virtues of more conventional journalism.
So will Tehelka survive? After you cannot conduct sting
operations with the Delhi police in tow. There are other
investigators in the team besides Bahl, says Tejpal. And adds
that given the three-year gestation period media ventures need,
Tehelka will certainly make it, hopefully as a pay site for those
who want quality reading on the Web.
* * *
Is "Kaun Banega Crorepati" beginning to pall? Getting tired of
trying to figure out whether or not Amitabh is wearing a wig?
Well, here is a new diversion. You can tune in an hour later
instead to a new show where the focus is a story, and the
diversion is trying to guess whether ad man Suhel Seth's
moustache is for real. "Jo Bolein Haan so Haan, Jo Bolein Naa, so
Naa" is a Hindi tongue twister but Southern audiences should not
let that put them off. Come and see this hour-long entertainer
licensed by Zee from Globo TV of Brazil. (The English version of
the show is called "You Decide".) If nothing else, it tells you
something about your countrymen. Or should one say country
persons?
What you get is a story line incorporating a dilemma. And the
audience decides how it should end. There are two numbers to call
for yes and no, in 10 cities. And obviously the final segment is
shot in two versions. Seth's role is to walk on at critical
points in the story and urge you to call the numbers on the
screen. Should the guy lie? We Indians are amazing. The majority
said yes in the first episode one watched. And in the second,
those who thought he should tell the truth were only 5,000 more
in number than those who thought he should not. The latter
numbered some 29,000. The programme collects a bunch of people in
the street of some city and takes their views off and on as the
story is enacted. Said a fat woman cheerfully, "He should not
tell the truth because all is fair in love, business, and war."
The script writers need to have some feminists come after them.
The husband wants to tell the truth, in each of the two episodes
I watched, and the wife does her darnedest to convince him that
he should not. At 10 p.m. on Zee, Monday to Wednesday. Because
the show is produced by two or three different companies, the
quality of production is uneven.
The Mahabharata goes global: Starting on Saturday, September 8,
Cartoon Network will feature "Pandavas - The Five Warriors", a
serialised version of a 3D animation film produced by the
Chennai-based Pentamedia Graphics limited.
It looks and sounds like an animated Amar Chitra Katha. It airs
between 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. back to back with a 3D version of
"Sinbad - Beyond the Vale of Mists".
E-mail the writer at sevantininan@vsnl.com
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Tragic love Next : Dramatic installations | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|