|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
WTO: stonewalling on implementation issues
By C. Rammanohar Reddy
GENEVA, AUG 1. The ``Like Minded Group'' at the World Trade
Organisation, an alliance that includes India, Pakistan,
Malaysia, Indonesia and Zimbabwe, on Tuesday said it was unfair
and a breach of faith to expect the developing countries to
endorse a new round of trade negotiations before there was
demonstrable progress in dealing with proposals to correct the
deficiencies in the existing trade agreements.
The ``implementation issues'', as 97 specific proposals are
called, have been on the table since mid-1999 and range over a
number of WTO agreements such as TRIPS, textiles, agriculture,
subsidies and anti-dumping duties. Until this week a decision had
been reached on only five relatively minor issues. And as if in
confirmation of the developing countries' accusations that their
demands were being stonewalled, as few as four more proposals
were identified on Tuesday evening for a possible early decision.
The important proposals on more market access in agriculture,
accelerating removal of quotas in textiles and lengthening
transition periods in TRIPS have been sidelined.
At a press meet, delegates from the group asserted it was wrong
on the part of the trade majors like the European Union and the
U.S. to block progress on the implementation issues by now
demanding that the proposals be negotiated as part of the next
round of trade talks. ``It was decided last year that settlement
of these issues would be part of a confidence-building process
and the proposals all resolved before the fourth ministerial
conference, so they cannot be made part of a new round. And if
they are not dealt with beforehand they raise questions about the
credibility of the system,'' added a Malaysian delegate.
Indian officials said that while no rich country had said these
were unimportant issues, they were yet unwilling to make specific
commitments on most of them. An official from Jamaica, another
member of the group, argued that as there was considerable
disappointment with the results of the Uruguay Round agreements,
a down payment on implementation would have ``symbolic and
substantive value'' in restoring the confidence of the developing
countries in the WTO and persuading them that they could benefit
from a new WTO round.
The developed countries, however, insist that the lack of
progress is not for want of trying. Mr. Peter Allgeier, Deputy
U.S. Trade Representative, said at another press conference that
the new U.S. Ambassador to the WTO had spent ``more time on
implementation than on any other trade issue''. But the time
spent has not resulted in concrete results. A few more
implementation issues have been referred once again to WTO
committees, which makes it highly unlikely that there will be any
major package of agreements announced before the Doha ministerial
meeting.
When the implementation issues were first identified and proposed
nearly three years ago, few governments and WTO trade officials
saw much merit in them. ``We have forced them to acknowledge the
seriousness and legitimacy of our demands,'' said one developing
country official.
``But the stonewalling that is now going on is not helping to
build confidence in the WTO, it only confirms the criticism that
the institution is riddled with iniquity.'' Whispers have begun
to be heard in the corridors that by constantly harping on their
implementation problems, countries with an insignificant share in
world trade are becoming obstacles in the launch of a new round.
This may not be a correct interpretation since the bigger
roadblocks are the differences between the Cairns group of
agricultural exporters and the E.U. over the agenda for farm
trade and between the U.S. and the rest of the world over anti-
dumping duties.
But that has not prevented suspicions that in the end the
implementation issues could become the sacrificial lamb in the
drive to reach a consensus on a wide-ranging agenda for a new WTO
round.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Border talks with China conclude Next : Anwar Khan, new PoK President | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|