|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Stalin gets copy of Acharyulu's complaint letter
By R.K.Radhakrishnan
CHENNAI, JULY. 26. The Municipal Administration Department has
finally decided to give the Chennai Mayor, Mr. M. K. Stalin, a
copy of the complaint- letter written by the Commissioner, Mr. J.
T. Acharyulu, on the ``undemocratic functioning of the Chennai
Corporation council.''
It was based on this letter, written on June 29, that the MAWS
department issued a show-cause notice the same day, asking why
the council should not be superceded.
The Municipal Administration and Water Supply department, which
governs the local bodies in the State, asked the Mayor and
council department to submit their explanation within 30 days.
In his letter, Mr. Acharyulu detailed ``the misuse of power by
the Mayor using the majority of the DMK in the Council, beyond
the powers conferred by law'' and sent it directly to the
Government. This was in contravention of Section 37 of the Madras
City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919, which insists that all
communication to the Government be carried out through the Mayor,
it was contended.
The Mayor took exception to this and asked the MAWS department to
give him a copy of the original complaint. The Mayor, in a
written communication to the department, demanded a copy of the
letter early this month. He followed it up with a reminder on
July 13. There was no response to both letters till July 25. The
Mayor also sought 30 days' time from the date of receipt of the
letter to reply.
``We received a copy of the complaint letter on July 25,'' the
Mayor said. Asked whether the department had given him the 30-day
time frame as he requested, the Mayor said there was no specific
reference to this aspect. ``The covering letter, dated July 24,
only said we should submit our reply at the earliest,'' he said.
The next course of action was being decided. Since there was a
mandatory notice period required for convening the council, it
may not be possible to reply to the department within the time
frame fixed by the MAWS department earlier, it is said. ``The
council has to reply. This letter is being routed through me. It
is for the council to decide on the issue and frame an
appropriate response,'' the Mayor said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Homage paid to Kargil martyrs Next : DMK decision only after consulting allies | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|