|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, July 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
PMK hopeful of ministerial berth
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JULY 26. The Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK), which
returned to the National Democratic Alliance fold, was hopeful
that the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, would reinduct
the party nominees in the Union Council of Ministers, even as it
blamed the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, Ms. Jayalalithaa, for the
``parting of ways.''
A day after the party rejoined the NDA, the PMK founder, Dr. S.
Ramadoss, told The Hindu, that while the issue of his party
nominees being accommodated in the Union Cabinet did not figure
in his meeting with Mr. Vajpayee on Wednesday night, he expected
it to happen whenever the Prime Minister carried out an
expansion.
Dr. Ramadoss, whose party snapped its links with the NDA five
months ago on the eve of the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections only
to rejoin, said the moves could not be seen as ``opportunistic''
but one forced by the ``intemperate and deceitful behaviour of
Ms. Jayalalithaa and listed several instances to justify the
decision to move out of the AIADMK camp.
He said the PMK joined the AIADMK front in the hope that the
latter would help the party form a coalition government in
Pondicherry and also secure a sizeable number of seats in the
Tamil Nadu assembly.
``Till the agreement was signed she exhibited courtesy and
cordiality to the PMK apparently to please it. But the events
that occurred in the post-agreement period proved disastrous to
the growth and self-respect of our party,'' Dr. Ramadoss said.
Listing out some ``acts of betrayal,'' he said though the PMK
agreed to contest 27 seats in Tamil Nadu, the party was denied
the constituencies it preferred and told where it should contest,
instead of deciding the seats through discussion and mutual
consultation.
In Pondicherry, he said, despite having an agreement with the
PMK, the AIADMK general secretary tried to rope in the Congress,
Tamil Maanila Congress and the Left parties without consultation.
When the PMK did not agree to give up the original conditions of
agreement, Ms. Jayalalithaa announced the constituencies
``erratically with very weak candidates'' which resulted in
creating an impression that the AIADMK-PMK alliance was the
weakest among the three alliances which contested the polls in
the Union Territory.
He said the AIADMK had contested against the Congress in 14 of
the 20 constituencies, but after the elections, Ms. Jayalalithaa
joined hands with the Congress to form a coalition government by
``deserting and ditching the PMK. Can there be a better instance
of hypocrisy and backstabbing that this political immorality...?
How can there be an alliance with such a person who shifts sides
within a month for the sake of power ?,'' he asked.
The other grievances were going back on the assurance of a Rajya
Sabha seat, no consultation among the allies on important policy
matters, no common minimum programme or coordination committee,
and settling scores with political opponents instead of
concentrating on the problems of the people.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : SP to stall Parliament over Phoolan's murder Next : Kalam, chief patron of JCST | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|