|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, June 10, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Next
Spell of the self-portrait
The self-portrait, artist Anju Dodiya's central pre-occupation
since her first solo exhibition, continues to exercise its
fascination over her. RANJIT HOSKOTE examines whether her recent
images are symptoms of a transformation to come.
AN exhibition of Anju Dodiya's recent paintings, held at Gallery
Chemould in Bombay (Mumbai), demonstrated that the self-portrait,
which has been the artist's central preoccupation since her first
solo exhibition in 1991, continues to exercise its fascination
over her. For a decade now, even as she has dedicated herself to
the delicate nuances of watercolours in preference over other
media, Dodiya has explored the nuances of what might be described
as autobiographical fiction, involving the staging of a pageant
of real and imagined self-images, a series of movements through
realistically rendered situations and dreamlike ones.
These self-images and situations may be drawn from a variety of
sources: in the course of her elaborate painted masquerade,
Dodiya has successively assumed the flamboyant, and even bizarre,
personae, among others, of a fashion model, a woman in Turkish
robes, a character from the Tarot, and a participant in an
allegory of the creative act, approaching the unmarked surface
with a Staedtler pencil and eraser.
Instructively, the word persona is derived from the Latin word
for an actor's mask, a device originally used in ancestor-worship
ceremonies, from where it passed into archaic theatre. What,
then, do Dodiya's changes of costume imply? Do they conceal a
secret self behind the sumptuous games of appearance, or do they
in fact reveal it to us through disguise?
Two conspicuous impulses govern Dodiya's art. There is, first,
her insatiable curiosity for novel instruments of self-
presentation. Since the entire universe offers itself as an
archive or museum to the metropolitan artist in the age of
globalisation, Dodiya finds the resources of every period,
culture, style and region arrayed before her.
This is an outward movement of expansion: her paintings are coded
with references to diverse orders of visual discourse and
experience, including the Japanese ukiyo-e prints, art cinema as
well as popular movies, Renaissance paintings and medieval
illuminated manuscripts.
But if this sophisticated exercise of choice suggests indulgence,
it is held in check by her equal, and opposite, impulse to
retreat into her inner reality, and to expose the haunting
disquietudes of that reality: her uncertainty as to the self's
purpose and direction.
At the core of Dodiya's project of self-portraiture lies the act
of painting, the will-to-art: her playing of roles testifies to a
knowing dialogue between the narcissism and irony that
simultaneously attend such artistic dedication, a desire to
proclaim the privacy and interiority of the artistic
consciousness as well as a need to move beyond the claustral
particularity of the individual self and its desires.
Dodiya's continuing project of fictive self-portraiture prompts
us to pose a number of questions to the artist. Without
suggesting that she abandon her concern with the narrative self,
the self that creates and re-invents itself through story, fable
and legend, it may well be asked how much further Dodiya can
develop this trajectory of self-dramatisation. At the level of
iconography and surface, it would appear that her strategies have
not substantially changed over the decade of her public activity
as an artist.
While the paintings have grown steadily in technical finesse, her
recent works rhyme with her earliest ones in various ways,
whether through the attention she invests in the self's costumes,
or the allegorical import of the situation, or the manner in
which she uses the mise-en-scene as a pretext for passages of
painterly fantasia. And while they provoke the viewer's curiosity
through an accomplished interplay between what we know of the
artist's personality and what we are told of her inner reality,
Dodiya's works continue to be marked by a characteristic defiance
of interpretation combined with a frank exhibitionism.
If these recent works, executed over 2000-2001, depart from the
trajectory that the artist has established for herself, it is
through the manifest feelings of rage towards the self that she
articulates here. In these recent paintings, Dodiya often
subjects her self-persona to violence: in "Hunt", she sits on her
haunches, holding her throbbing head, uncertain how to use the
axe she possesses; in "Vigil", one of her self-projections
watches as another one is strung from a gallows-frame by her
heels; in "Rain", she tries to protect herself against a flailing
shower of swords.
Is it possible, we ask ourselves, to construe these images as
symptoms of a transformation to come? Is Dodiya in the process of
mapping a wider landscape for herself, one in which the dramas of
the individual self are located in a perspective that includes
other crises, other relationships, the recognition of other
viewpoints? The body, sings Kabir, has many owners; it is by
acknowledging the effect of others on the self, more overtly than
she has so far done, that Anju Dodiya could work her way out of
the no-exit situation that confronts her idiom of fictive self-
portraiture.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Next : Guarding the world, together | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|