|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, June 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Liberation and after
INDIA-BANGLADESH RELATIONS: Rekha Saha; Minerva Associates, 7B,
Lake Place, Kolkata-700029. Rs. 250.
INDIA'S RELATIONS with her neighbours have been determined by the
legacy of history, geography and the events and inputs from
regional and international environment. The relationship between
India and Bangladesh is decided, apart from what has been said
above, on a few more very serious factors. They were one country
for centuries and the Partition was forced on them in 1947, by
the Raj on the basis of religion. The bilateral relationship
between these two countries is largely conditioned by the
Partition of Bengal into West Bengal (India) and East Pakistan
(Bangladesh) in 1947. The second important factor is that India
shares its border with Bangladesh for more than 2500 miles and at
least 600 miles out of it, was not clearly demarcated. The
Radcliffe Award of 1947 and the Algot Bagge Tribunal were
connected with the Indo-Bangladesh border dispute. India had to
get involved in the freedom struggle of Bangladesh on ideological
as well as on geopolitical reasons. It was also not wrong to say
that India was supporting Bangladesh against Pakistan, because
Pakistan was not a friendly country to India, and was to a
certain extent an enemy. Kautilya, while discussing the
``Rajamandala'', would say that ``enemy's enemy is a friend''
(``Arimithra mithra'') and it was one of the cardinal principles
of foreign policy and balance of power, that ``Arimithra mithra''
should be the watchword, guiding international relations and
diplomacy. While conducting diplomacy with Bangladesh, India had
to follow the above-mentioned factors.
The book aims at evaluating the trends and patterns in Indo-
Bangladesh relationship more in a chronological perspective.
According to the author, a proper study of the relations can be
made only in the context of the liberation movement of the people
of Bangladesh against the West Pakistani rulers. The genocide in
East Pakistan created a sharp reaction among the Indian people.
She divides the subject into three chronologically arranged
periods viz., the Sheikh Mujibur Rahman era, the Ziaur Rahman era
and lastly the Ershad era.
During the regime of Mujibur Rahman, the relationship between the
two was most friendly and cordial. The values and ideals of the
Awami League were similar to those of the elites of the ruling
Congress Party of India. It was during his period, that the
Border Agreement of 1974 was reached and implemented. After the
assassination of Mujibur Rahman, Gen. Ziaur Rahman brought into
existence an anti-India stance, calling India's role as that of
big brother. The Farakka Dam issue and the Joint River Commission
were the bones of contention between the two countries. After the
assassination of Ziaur Rahman, Gen. Ershad took over the reigns
of the government of Bangladesh. It was during his period that
the leasing of Tin Bigha Corridor, was agreed upon which removed
some of the irritants in the Indo-Bangladesh border dispute. The
book also deals with the current and ongoing issues which are
likely to affect the bilateral relations between the two nations
and create tension in this region.
The author has taken great pains in presenting the issues, in
simple and lucid language, which helps even a layman to grasp and
understand Indo-Bangladesh relations. It is a very useful book.
C. A. PERUMAL
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Doyen of Indian English literature Next : Know your English | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|