|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, March 10, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Dichotomy in Govt.'s forest policy
By P. Venugopal
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, MARCH 9. The State Government's commitment to
the cause of conservation has two diametrically opposite
dimensions. Both are on full display in the 777-sq.km. Periyar
Tiger Reserve (PTR) where the Mullaperiyar reservoir and the
Sabarimala shrine are located.
Tamil Nadu's demand for raising the maximum permissible level of
the Mullaperiyar reservoir brought out the conservationist in
Kerala Government. It even made the State Forest Department
implead in the case currently being tried in the Supreme Court to
argue how raising the reservoir level would damage the ecosystem
of the PTR through the submersion of fresh tracts of wildlife
territory. The Forest Department was asked to prepare a strong
case against Tamil Nadu's demand, describing under what all
provisions of the conservation laws of the land raising the
reservoir level is untenable.
The same department becomes everybody's whipping boy at
Sabarimala. Not a single word is it permitted to utter when the
Travancore Dewaswom Board (TDB) comes up with its wild ideas of
development in Lord Ayyappa's sacred grove. Mr. C. K. Nanu is the
Minister for both Forests and the Dewaswom Board here. The latest
project being contemplated by the TDB is to construct a
serpentine `nadapanthal' (roofed footpath) along the entire 4-km
stretch from Pampa to the Sannidhanam. A leading liquor
manufacturing company is understood to have volunteered to build
this `nadapanthal' for the TDB. Soon the pilgrims could feast
their devout eyes on the hoardings of certain popular brands of
Indian-made foreign liquor as they trek their way up the holy
hills to have a `darshan' of Lord Ayyappa.
The TDB probably feels that a roofed footpath will be more
comforting to the pilgrims than the cool shade of the towering
trees which line the route. The trees are inconvenient anyway,
since they take up valuable space which can be leased out for
commercial purposes during the pilgrim season to bring higher
revenues to the TDB. Also, it is an inconsequential matter that a
roofed footpath along such a long stretch in the forests could
cause some inconvenience to the elephants and other wildlife of
the region.
Almost all agencies which had studied the issues relating to
Sabarimala (including the Legislative Committee on Environment)
had recommended that development works in this area should be
undertaken only on the basis of a masterplan. In fact, such a
plan, which gives due importance to both the environmental
aspects and the needs of pilgrimage, was also got ready by the
Legislative Committee after conducting a series of seminars and
workshops.
However, this masterplan now lies in cold storage. Whenever the
TDB gets a new development idea, the strategy is to use political
pressure on the Forest Department to keep quiet and go ahead with
its programme. The strategy also involves getting favourable
court orders to guard against interference. None challenges the
TDB's invocations in the court; the political equations at
Sabarimala do not permit it.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Quota rules for local body polls soon Next : Pillai move to seek bail in SC | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|