|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, March 10, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
States may resent decentralisation
By Gargi Parsai
NEW DELHI, MARCH 9. The Centre's attempt to cut the food subsidy
bill by decentralising procurement for the Public Distribution
System (PDS) is not likely to go down well with the States,
already facing a resource crunch.
The move to decentralise procurement had been initiated before
the budget as a policy of the Food Ministry. In fact, the Food
and Civil Supplies Minister, Mr. Shanta Kumar, had written to the
States seeking their cooperation. Only Uttar Pradesh, Madhya
Pradesh and West Bengal responded, whereas the move is targeted
more at initiating food-growing States such as Punjab, Haryana,
Andhra Pradesh and Orissa to procure their own requirements.
The idea was to have the States produce, procure, store and
distribute their requirement of foodgrains, and hand over the
surplus to the Food Corporation of India for buffer stocking.
Only Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal have been
procuring their grain. But after the budget announcement by the
Finance Minister, Mr. Yashwant Sinha, to allow the States to make
their own procurement, States such as West Bengal have already
started crying foul. Others have alleged that the ``Centre is
shirking its responsibility''.
However, the fact is that last year the Centre has had to bear a
subsidy of nearly Rs. 700 crores for procurement by the States.
The subsidy is the difference between the Central issue price and
the economic cost. The subsidy to Uttar Pradesh was about Rs. 400
crores, to Madhya Pradesh about Rs. 70 crores and to West Bengal
about Rs. 100 crore.
Uttar Pradesh procures both rice and wheat on its own. West
Bengal procures rice and buys partly from Chhatisgarh. Madhya
Pradesh procures wheat on its own, but buys its rice requirement
from the Centre. Tamil Nadu is another State that procures its
own requirement.
Sources in the Food Ministry said the measure was being initiated
to reduce the economic cost of handling foodgrains by the Food
Corporation of India, encourage procurement of quality grains,
ensure distribution of local preferences of foodgrains in the PDS
and rid the FCI of demurrage costs on transportation.
The proposed step is also an attempt by the Centre to get out of
the political arm-twisting by food- producing States to procure
sub-standard grains that nobody wants to lift.
In the post-budget scenario, the Ministry is reviewing its
internal policy to work out the modalities. However, the crunch
lies in the fine-print of the budget declaration which says:
``FCI will continue to procure foodgrains for maintaining food
security reserves and for such State Governments who will assign
it this task on their behalf.''
For the moment, it seems all State Governments will want the FCI
to procure for the Public Distribution System.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Malaysia's help may be sought to end film piracy Next : PMO seeks report on 'manhandling' of airline executive | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|