|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Exploring the mind
"MAY I be a guard for those who are protectorless, a guide for
those who journey on the road. For those who wish to go across
the water, may I be a boat, a raft, a bridge." As he recited this
ancient verse, near the Bodhi tree at Bodh Gaya last December,
the Dalai Lama was moved to tears. He stopped and waited
silently, unassumingly, until able to speak again wrote Matthieu
Ricard, a monk, scholar and activist.
This monk is one among millions of people who are guided by this
longing for deep harmony and compassion. Is this inner quest the
best way to help one's fellow-beings? Or is it not better to
devote one's energies to solving the many material causes of
suffering in this world?
Matthieu Ricard's unique journey is in itself an answer to these
questions. Yet this is not merely an individual's life story. It
is a confluence of energies that feed an eternal creative quest.
It is also a continuation of the centuries-old dialogue between
the West and the East.
Matthieu was born in France in 1946 and grew up steeped in
Western scientific culture at the highest level. He wrote a
brilliant Ph.D. thesis in molecular biology and worked in the
team of a Nobel Prize winning biologist. But, by the time he
reached the post-graduate level, Matthieu had realised that while
science was very interesting it wasn't enough to give meaning to
his life. Instead he was much more drawn to the contemplative
science of a spiritual life.
At just about that time he saw a series of films about Tibetan
Buddhist lamas who had escaped after the Chinese occupation of
their country and settled in India, Nepal and Bhutan. "I had the
impression of seeing living beings who were the very image of
what they taught...I said to myself, if it's possible to reach
perfection as a human being, that must be it."
So Matthieu made several trips to India and became the disciple
of Kangyur Rinpoche, a Tibetan Buddhist lama, who was then living
in Darjeeling. On completing his Ph.D. in 1972 he gave up his
scientific career and moved permanently to India. For most of his
peers in France and his father, who is a well-known philosopher
and writer, this choice was baffling - even distressing. How
could such a brilliant young man give up the chance to make great
scientific discoveries and instead adopt a life of prayer and
meditation?
Today, almost 30 years later, Matthieu is a monk, a highly
respected scholar of Tibetan Buddhist texts and the Dalai Lama's
French translator. A few years ago, at the request of several
common friends, he engaged in a wide ranging dialogue with his
father - Jean-Francois Revel. The result is The Monk and the
Philosopher: East Meets West in a Father-Son Dialogue (Thorsons,
1998) a book-length conversation which partly captures Matthieu's
journey and has been described as an intellectual banquet.
With the philosopher-father asking most of the questions and
monk-son answering, this conversation traverses a vast terrain.
What is consciousness? What is the nature of the mind? Who or
what is this I? For example, Jean-Francois posits the view of all
materialist philosophies, and much of modern neurophysiology,
which reduces consciousness to an amalgam of material, chemical
reactions and biological structures. Various Eastern traditions
of meditation and yoga know this to be a false view. Matthieu
relates several of his own experiences, and stories about great
lamas, which contradict the materialist view. But how can this be
proved and verified, challenges Jean-Francois?
To which Matthieu can only say that the same experience and
realisation is attainable by anyone who works hard for it:
Observation of the nature of the mind, from a purely
contemplative point of view, can bring about a certainty just as
complete as observing a body falling under the effect of gravity.
Jean Francois' primary focus in this dialogue is to understand
different facets of Buddhism and thus unravel how and why it now
evokes so much interest in the West. This question has many
answers. Partly they relate to the power of Buddhism as a science
of the mind. But perhaps the more important dimension of
Buddhism's appeal is its emphasis on inner harmony and thus
compassion.
Thus, the theme of acting on oneself and acting on the world
takes up an entire chapter and is virtually a linking thread
running through the dialogue. As Jean-Francois asks: Buddhism may
be one way of escaping from suffering, but hasn't the West found
another way of doing the same, by transforming the outer world
and human societies?
Matthieu replies that improvement of material conditions is a
necessary but not sufficient factor in the journey of life, for
transforming the outer world has its limits...(because) to act on
the world without having transformed oneself can't lead to either
lasting or profound happiness.
True, concedes Jean-Francois, that a wise Lama can influence the
few who come in contact with him but what is the value of this
compared to transforming the world by knowledge of its laws. He
then refers to many of the life-transforming inventions of modern
science and technology - such as the steam engine, telescope,
microscope, vaccines etc. In the last 30 years that Matthieu has
spent in monasteries, molecular biology has made startling
advances which help to improve human life and Jean-Francois
gropes to see if Matthieu has any regrets about not taking part
in these discoveries.
"Biology seems to have been doing fine without me," answers
Matthieu. "The real question for me was to establish an order of
priorities in my life. Increasingly, I had the feeling that I
wasn't using the potential of human life as well as I could, but
that day by day I was letting my life slip away. For me, the mass
of scientific knowledge had become a major contribution to minor
needs."
Naturally, Jean-Francois is aghast at such a light dismissal of
several centuries of scientific achievement. Curing diseases,
living longer, traveling long distances at high speed instead of
having to trudge through mud for weeks - these are not minor
needs.
Matthieu is quick to clarify and agree that there is an inherent
value in material progress that alleviates suffering. But better
medicines and living longer are not an end in themselves: If
spiritual values stop being an inspiration for a society,
material progress becomes a sort of facade that masks the
pointlessness of life. Of course, to live longer is to profit
from an increased opportunity of giving meaning to life. But
without a depth of meaning well just run the risk of having to
live out 200 years of depression, or 300 years of bad moods.
Instead, one can aspire to plunge to the deepest realms of the
inner journey and, perhaps, attain to the state described thus by
the seventh-century master Shantideva:
"Look at my delighted laughter!
The delight of a vast, free mind!
The experience of lightness of being
As when emerging from a narrow gorge
Onto a high, wide mountain pass!
Look how, free from mistaking things as real,
I am blissful, and yet more blissful,
Enjoying the realm of primordial wakefulness!"
Such a wakeful mind can be a powerful instrument for many needs
of the material, social, political dimension.
For example, many Buddhist monks are today also intensively
engaged in struggles for justice, including the movement to free
Tibet. Matthieu himself is a passionate proponent of this cause.
In 1998 he wrote a letter to Kofi Anan, the Secretary General of
the United Nations saying: If the Declaration of Human Rights is
universal, please don't exclude Tibet. "If it is not universal,
just say so". He urged the UN to take concrete action on the
issue of Tibet for "...comforting words to a dying nation are but
a meager sustenance." Today, more and more social-political
activists are seeking to anchor themselves in spiritual
strengths. But for many the external transformative agenda
remains predominant. Giving full priority to the inner journey is
often seen as risky - for it may take one away from the task of
improving life in the here and now. Here, perhaps, is one answer
to such doubts. As Matthieu puts it: "You could say that action
on the world is desirable, while inner transformation is
indispensable."
RAJNI BAKSHI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Weeding out corruption with a will Next : Sacrifice for the country | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|