|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Lost simplicity
Globalisation has brought with it an ever-widening chasm between
the rich and the poor. In the context of this reality, excessive
consumerism, as displayed during the Christmas season, is a
blatant disregard of the values taught by Christianity. T. R. JOY
writes on the need to rethink our responsibility towards the
underprivileged.
CHRISTMAS in the world today has become one of the few
international mega festivals. Christmas is the time, especially
for the first world, to spend billions of dollars eating and
drinking, shopping and partying evermore lavishly. This time, as
the first Christmas of the new millennium, the global business
parasites saw to it that Christmas spending rose to the peak. A
few years ago, there were reports of TV channels using even
pornography for Christmas sales promotion.
Despite such extravagant market euphoria for December 25 as the
celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ, there are Christian
denominations and sects that observe it on different dates. The
Armenian Church and the Church of the East in Trissur, Kerala,
for instance, celebrate Christmas on January 6. Many have posited
the theory that the feast of Christ's nativity was instituted in
Rome or possibly in North Africa as a Christian rival to the non-
Christian festival of the sun god at the winter solstice.
December 25 historically was also the birthday of the Iranian god
Mithra venerated as the sun of righteousness.
As we know, the conversion of Emperor Constantine in AD 312
established Christianity as the official religion of the empire.
With the royal sanction, the commemoration of Christ's birth
acquired prominence in the Roman calendar. According to one Roman
almanac, the Church in Rome commemorated Christmas by the year
336. But, the eastern churches did not observe it in the early
centuries of Christianity. And, the exact circumstances of the
beginning of the Christmas Day remain obscure.
How strange and ironic it is that we have a Christmas budget for
billions of dollars to honour the supposed birthday of the One
whose parents, as the legend goes, could not manage a decent
place for his birth and had to make do with a cowshed. Jesus is
believed to have led a simple lifestyle and insisted on the true
Christian religious responsibility of committed engagement for
truth, justice and compassion to all, specially to the
underprivileged and the marginalised. Worse, the irony looks
farcical when the ambiguity surrounding the nativity myth is
almost always overlooked, and normally forgotten.
The central events of the Christian faith and spirituality are
Jesus Christ's self sacrifice upon the cross and the eventual
Christian trust in His resurrection. But, the nativity myths,
which are a later addition to the Bible and to Christmas - which
is a still later Christian invention - have turned out to be the
grandest of Christian feasts. Cannot we smell a global
conspiracy, probably by the people who have a stake in
consumerism and market? They could not have made such big bucks
sponsoring a Good Friday, an event more central to Christian
vocation and religious practice.
Restraint in consumption and generosity to the less privileged in
society have been recognised and recommended as a virtue in many
religions throughout the ages. Socially responsible consumption
and rigorous practice of social justice should be all the more so
in Christian worldview and everyday living. Otherwise, as Dr.
Aloysius Pieris, a Jesuit theologian and priest from Sri Lanka
put it, Christianity would be creating and perpetuating a
"leisure class" through prayer centres and ashrams that attract
mostly the rich to short spells of mental tranquillity rather
than a life of simplicity and spirituality. Responsible Christian
spirituality is not the doctrinal conclusion of a theology. It
should evolve from the radical involvement with and support for
the poor and the oppressed.
Maurice F. Strong, chairman of the Earth Council and president of
the UN University for Peace, observes in his article in The Hindu
Survey of the Environment 2000: "if everyone in the world were to
adopt the current consumption patterns of the rich countries, an
extra three planets like Earth would be required to support
them." Another authority on our environment and our common
future, Dr. Gro Brundtland, Director General of WHO, has this
report at the end of 1999: "Since Rio, the number of people
living in absolute poverty has increased. Today, some 1300
million people live on less than a dollar a day. At U.S. two a
day, the number rises to half of the world population - to three
billion fellow human beings." Even in this country, the gap
between the rich and the poor is widening alarmingly.
In the context of this dire reality of our contemporary world and
society, Christian perspectives on Christmas should be
reconsidered and radically revised with authentic Christian
significance and proactive charge. Otherwise, Christmas will
continue to slide into a global commercial soap opera, cleverly
stage-managed like beauty pageants and international trade
festivals, profit as their prime deity. Then, the Christian
religious conscience and the Christian elite will be guilty of
their unholy and irreligious alliance with global parasites
feeding on the poor around them. The Bible is categorical in its
commandment: "No one can serve two masters... God and Mammon."
(Matthew 6:24).
The author is a lecturer in English and a literary critic.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Where's the reason for the season? Next : Plastic patriotism | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|