|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Retreat, reconciliation?
The BJP in Kerala saw the Prime Minister's Kumarakom retreat as
an opportunity to build bridges with dominant minority segments.
GEORGE JACOB discusses the impact of this strategy.
THE PRIME Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, finished his
Kumarakom retreat and started a debate on the dialogue he had
with Christian prelates and its possible political fallout. A
debate was in the air with the very selection of Kumarakom in the
Christian heartland as his ``holiday destination''. And in the
vortex of this debate is the State unit of the BJP, which, since
its inception, had found itself at sea in Kerala's unique socio-
political milieu.
Inspite of declamations to the contrary, it was beyond doubt that
the BJP's State leaders wanted to use the visit of the Sangh
Parivar's most secular face to build bridges with dominant
minority segments in the State without whom they cannot dream of
opening an account in the Kerala Assembly. After years of trying
to bring together the Nair and Ezhava communities, without any
success, they appeared to have come to the conclusion that it was
easier to cap the religious gap, than caste differences.
For the Church leaders, however, the issue was an entirely
different one. The dialogue, to be effective and productive, had
to address the core issues involved in protecting minority
rights. While they had their own grievances, these had to be
addressed in the larger perspective of the problems of the
minorities, they maintained. They had nothing to hide and made
their intentions clear at a press conference much before they
were officially invited for the parleys.
It was clear that the top BJP brass were not interested in making
such a clear statement on minority issues, especially at a time
when they had identified a more vigorous pursuance of Hindutva as
their strategy for the ensuing elections in Uttar Pradesh. After
protracted dilly- dallying, they appeared to have found a way out
by inviting the bishops for an audience on a Sunday morning,
thereby, providing the `not so keen' sections an opportunity to
stay away citing `preoccupations'.
With only six of the bishops arriving for the conclave, and
majority of them confining themselves to issues such as the
crisis on the agriculture front, the meeting could be turned into
a low-key affair as intended by the BJP think-tank.
However, the decision to fix the appointment for a Sunday morning
has come for severe criticism as many like Dr. Ninan Koshy, human
rights activist, believe that it has only once again proved the
BJP's lack of sensitivity to other cultures. The only saving
grace for the occasion was the presence of the highly respected
and by far the seniormost prelate in the Christian community in
India, the Catholicos of the East, Baselius Marthoma Mathews II
of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, who expressed the
community's apprehensions and called upon the Prime Minister to
rise above party and communal considerations as he was the Prime
Minister of all Indians.
``The only way the situation could have been redeemed was by
responding to the call made by the Catholicos,'' says Dr. Koshy
and points out that this was exactly what the Prime Minister did
not do. Dr. Koshy takes exception to the claim that the attacks
on minorities have no ideological bearing and points out that it
was Mr. Vajpayee himself who initiated a debate on conversion at
the height of the attacks against Christians in Gujarat in 1998.
And it was the series of statements made by the Parivar leaders
which created a climate of antagonism which resulted in the
attacks, he adds. The Archbishop of Thiruvananthapuram and
president of the Catholic Bishops Conference of India (CBCI),
Cyril Mar Baselius, too believes that while the violent acts
could be taken as a law and order problem, the Prime Minister had
the responsibility to allay the fears created in the mind of the
minorities.
However, that it has generated a debate itself is the greatest
benefit for the party, says one of the senior BJP leaders. He
points out that the climate of `untouchability' is no more there
as the BJP could open a window at the highest level with various
social groups.
And many of its leaders believe that they could drive a wedge in
the Christian leadership, though those who came for the conclave
did not represent even half the Christians in Kerala.
But will this reflect in the coming Assembly polls? The BJP
leaders are noncommittal; they are well aware that unlike the
Panchayati Raj elections where social connections are the key,
the Assembly polls are more political.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Undermining welfare Next : Will Uncle Sam go into a shell? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|