|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Next
Allegations scurrilous: Brajesh Mishra
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, JAN. 6. The J. K. Jain campaign against the Prime
Minister, Mr. A. B. Vajpayee, and his Principal Secretary, Mr.
Brajesh Mishra, achieved its purpose of provoking a response
today.
Mr. Mishra issued a statement, denying the allegations by Dr.
Jain and his television channel, Jain TV, and terming them
``scurrilous and aimed at character-assassination.''
Dr. Jain's most serious charge is that Mr. Mishra had secured the
release of a relative, Brig. Arun Mishra, from the Army on the
eve of the Kargil conflict.
In his rejoinder, the Principal Secretary asserts ``I have no
relative called Brig. Arun Mishra, nor have I ever met him.''
(In a separate development, Brig. Mishra, who is now Chief
General Manager (vigilance), Maruti Udyog Limited, has issued a
statement saying he was not in any way related to Mr. Brijesh
Mishra, nor had he ever met him.
Brig. Mishra also explains that he had sought premature
retirement long before the Kargil conflict broke out).
Another allegation made by Dr. Jain relates to a presumed report
filed by the R&AW against Mr. Aftab Hussain Saikia, to prevent
his appointment as a judge of the Gauhati High Court.
In his statement, Mr. Mishra notes that ``there was no report by
R&AW in this regard. In fact, on the basis of a report by another
Central intelligence agency, the objection regarding his
appointment raised by a State Government on the basis of a State
police report, was overruled by the Union Government. Mr. Saikia
went on to become a judge of the Gauhati High Court.''
Dr. Jain had also alleged that Mr. Mishra had used his position
to help his niece, Ms. Vibha Mishra, secure ``Government
advertising contracts.'' But, the Principal Secretary says
``nothing can be farther from the truth. She has been running an
advertising agency since 1992.
I have not used my official position so as to favour her through
any out-of-turn contract. It is totally baseless to say that she
has been given any Government contracts worth Rs. 10 crores.''
The entire BJP establishment finds itself embarrassed at the
extent of Dr. Jain's sweeping allegations against the Prime
Minister. Today, the vice-president, Mr. Jana Krishnamurthy,
hinted that Dr. Jain could be expelled from the BJP if the local
district unit so decided.
It is learnt that once Dr. Jain, generally regarded as a protege
of Mr. L. K. Advani, crossed the Rubicon and sent a legal notice
to the Prime Minister and others, it was the Home Minister - with
some prompting from the Law Minister, Mr. Arun Jaitely - who took
the initiative to have the book thrown at him.
Dr. Jain was told to withdraw the legal notice or face
disciplinary action. But the ``video doctor'' was diffident, and
had to be expelled from the BJP's national executive.
It was belatedly realised that Dr. Jain was trying to create a
wedge between the Prime Minister and the Home Minister, and that
he had to be shown the door before he could inflict real damage.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Next : Bomb hoax at airport | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|