UDRS is a joke in its present form: Latif

March 07, 2011 10:20 am | Updated September 30, 2016 08:26 pm IST - Karachi

Pakistan’s former captain Rashid Latif says he shares Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s concerns about the accuracy of the Umpires Decision Review System (UDRS) as the innovation is nothing but a “joke” in its present form.

“The manner in which the system has been applied in the World Cup and the way decisions of the umpires have been reversed or upheld because of it indicate it is nothing but a joke,” Latif said.

Latif said the system was simply not serving its purpose in its present form specially without the hotspot technology.

“Every system requires its entire components in order, but here a major component of the system (hot-spot) is missing. Also, the hawk-eye does not consider the nature of the wicket while showing the trajectory of the ball”, the former Pakistan captain said.

He gave the example of the India and Ireland match on Sunday in Bangalore.

“In the India-Ireland match an Irish batsman (Cusack) was given LBW after a review. Earlier the umpire correctly turned down the appeal because the batsman was well down the track -- more than 2.5 metres. To me it was a clear-cut decision, but the hawk-eye suggested otherwise. If the wicket was of the Perth then it would be a mind-boggling decision,” Latif noted.

He pointed out that it was very difficult for the technology to take into account the nature and bounce of pitches as they were all different in different countries and in varying climate.

India has offered the sole opposition to the UDRS system until now with the International Cricket Council saying majority of the other Test-playing nations had supported the innovation after looking at the results of the experiments carried out in last two years.

Latif said if the system is to be used effectively, the ICC should first make sure the broadcasters and concerned boards had all the components required to make it a success.

“In the World Cup the technology they are using for the UDRS is lacking because it is difficult to make a judgement on basis of replays available to us,” Latif noted.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.