Defiant IOA goes ahead with elections

December 05, 2012 03:02 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:54 pm IST - New Delhi

Lalit Bhanot, center, who was recently elected as the secretary general of the Indian Olympic Association gestures during the IOA AGM in New Delhi on Wednesday. Bhanot is facing graft charges relating to the Commonwealth Games.

Lalit Bhanot, center, who was recently elected as the secretary general of the Indian Olympic Association gestures during the IOA AGM in New Delhi on Wednesday. Bhanot is facing graft charges relating to the Commonwealth Games.

: In what was seen as an open defiance of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) went through with its elections as scheduled on Wednesday.

Abhay Singh Chautala (president), Lalit K. Bhanot (secretary-general) and N. Ramachandran (treasurer) were declared elected unopposed, while Virendra Nanavati was also unopposed while taking the senior vice-president’s post.

The rest of the places in the Executive Council were filled through elections supervised by a three-member commission comprising retired High Court judges.

The IOC had stated on Tuesday that the IOA was not entitled to hold any elections without its prior approval, but the IOA stuck to its stand that it was going ahead with the process as per Delhi High Court orders.

It looked as though the IOA was prepared to face the music and possibly further sanctions from the IOC with this act of defiance. Quite significantly, the Randhir Singh faction did not attend the Annual General Meeting that preceded the elections.

Out of the 183 votes, 167 were cast for the posts that were contested. Eight ballots — three of Indian Hockey Federation, three of Gymnastics Federation of India and two of the Haryana Olympic Association — were kept sealed as per a court order.

Vijay Kumar Malhotra, who chaired the AGM as acting president, said that the IOA had gone ahead with the elections since it could not go against the court order.

The IOA officials discounted the possibility of approaching the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to fight the suspension imposed by the IOC. The general refrain was there was no question of having a confrontation with the IOC.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.