We haven’t cleared Meiyappan: police

"We have not finished with our probe yet and are looking for custody of Pakistani umpire Asad Rauf"

July 29, 2013 07:26 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:49 pm IST - Mumbai

CHENNAI: 19/03/2012 : FOR SPORTS: Chennai Super Kings owner Gurunath Meiyappan seen during a press briefing in Chennai on Monday. Photo: K_Pichumani

CHENNAI: 19/03/2012 : FOR SPORTS: Chennai Super Kings owner Gurunath Meiyappan seen during a press briefing in Chennai on Monday. Photo: K_Pichumani

The Mumbai Police on Monday said they had not cleared Gurunath Meiyappan — team principal of Chennai Super Kings and son-in-law of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president N. Srinivasan — in the betting scandal that rocked this year’s Indian Premier League.

“There is no question of giving a clean chit to him [Mr. Meiyappan]. We have not finished with our investigation yet and are looking for the custody of Pakistani umpire Asad Rauf to probe him for his role in the scandal. We will soon be filing a charge sheet,” said Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime) Himanshu Roy.

Mr. Meiyappan was arrested two months ago by the authorities for his alleged involvement in a betting racket during the IPL.

The BCCI, in its letter dated June 28 to the Mumbai Police, informed them about the formation of a two-member inquiry commission to probe the allegations against Mr. Meiyappan.

“We request you to kindly depute an officer conversant with the investigation, along with relevant records, to be present on July 7, 2013… so that the commission can gather the full details and record the facts as found by your department.”

The Mumbai Police received the letter on July 4. In reply a letter sent by Mr. Roy the next day said: “As the case is still under investigation, you are requested to kindly quote relevant legal provisions under which the investigating officer or any other officer from the investigating agency can be called before the probe commission.”

The board did not reply back.

“According to law, an investigating officer can depose only in front of the court and not to inquiry commission formed by a private body. Asking an officer to depose was unconstitutional,” said Mr. Roy.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.